Anonymous wrote:Op, in your story, you were not popular as a kid. And now you are not popular as an adult. You seem to have thought getting a makeover would make you popular as an adult.
The common denominator in these stories is you.
Also, neither children nor adults are required to be “inclusive” to random people if they don’t have a natural friendly connection with them.
It seems like you don’t understand how friends work.
Anonymous wrote:Op, in your story, you were not popular as a kid. And now you are not popular as an adult. You seem to have thought getting a makeover would make you popular as an adult.
The common denominator in these stories is you.
Also, neither children nor adults are required to be “inclusive” to random people if they don’t have a natural friendly connection with them.
It seems like you don’t understand how friends work.
Anonymous wrote:I have not experienced that in the American suburban school mom circles I've been part of. On the contrary, the friendly extroverts are sought after.
But... you could be describing my extended family in my native country in Europe. So incredibly uptight and haughty. Everyone has to glom on to the highest ranking person, and that person will always look down their nose at everyone else.
Which is why I'm here now![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s where’s you live. I moved to Northern California and it’s very inclusive here. Totally different.
Yes. The problem is this area.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think you had as much of a "glow up" as you think you did, and you are striving. You are going to want to say you aren't striving -- but your use of language, like "social capital" betrays a hyper-vigilance about the social strata. Like I said, you will claim you aren't striving like a 7th grader desperate to be in the popular crowd. But you are. You are just doing it with this ineffective "kind" and "open and fun" stuff, and criticizing what you identify as "haughtiness." There are hierarchies. The sooner you accept your place in them, the better for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am grateful that early on I developed the ability to detect drama and bullsh*t from a mile away and I do not engage.
It's not just an ability to detect BS, it's an ability to be comfortably apart from it that matters. Those people can do their drama and BS thing and that's just fine, leave me out of it. I think I'm pleasant and reasonably friendly, but I'm not at all interested in who or what is popular among the mom crowd. Ironically, I suspect some might view me as standoffish lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I tend to attribute that kind of unfriendly behavior in adults to a lack of social skills, and I never really encountered it until I had DCs and was obligated to interact with other parents at school and in other settings. I was PA president for a couple of years, and I was constantly dealing with people who didn't seem to understand that being arrogant or condescending straight out of the gate is not a good way to win friends and influence people.
All we have here is that OP feels like part of women supporting other women means she should be able to walk into PTA and be friendly and attractive and other women should want to be her friend, and it's not working. That's weird, and you don't need to be arrogant or condescending to not be into that.
It's not weird to make an effort to be friendly to other parents in a school setting where you presumably want to encourage a supportive community and model normal social skills for your kids. I'm not suggesting everyone needs to be friends and have fun together, but OP has described these women as catty and haughty. I would define the inability to be cordial to other people in a PTA meeting or soccer game, even if you don't want to be their friends, as a poor social skill.
Anonymous wrote:I am grateful that early on I developed the ability to detect drama and bullsh*t from a mile away and I do not engage.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think you had as much of a "glow up" as you think you did, and you are striving. You are going to want to say you aren't striving -- but your use of language, like "social capital" betrays a hyper-vigilance about the social strata. Like I said, you will claim you aren't striving like a 7th grader desperate to be in the popular crowd. But you are. You are just doing it with this ineffective "kind" and "open and fun" stuff, and criticizing what you identify as "haughtiness." There are hierarchies. The sooner you accept your place in them, the better for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I tend to attribute that kind of unfriendly behavior in adults to a lack of social skills, and I never really encountered it until I had DCs and was obligated to interact with other parents at school and in other settings. I was PA president for a couple of years, and I was constantly dealing with people who didn't seem to understand that being arrogant or condescending straight out of the gate is not a good way to win friends and influence people.
All we have here is that OP feels like part of women supporting other women means she should be able to walk into PTA and be friendly and attractive and other women should want to be her friend, and it's not working. That's weird, and you don't need to be arrogant or condescending to not be into that.