Would be brilliant if someone leaked the endorsement as it was already written.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think news organizations should endorse any politician. Shouldn’t the news agencies remain unbiased?

Sure. But a new policy should go in effect after the election, obviously.

Yes we cancelled our post subscription and Amazon yesterday.

Anonymous wrote:DH and I discussed doing so but the fact is, we are probably in the top 5% of Amazon customers, so unless we break that habit first, there’s really no point in cancelling the Post.

So why don’t you break your Amazon habit? I did, and it feels pretty good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The billionaires are killing democracy. Same thing happened with the LA Times.

Huh,

Soros is the single largest donor to liberal Democratic politicians and their policy agendas.

Trump is collecting billionaires and making them offers of positions and huge tax cuts - Musk, Adelson, Shanahan…

I canceled mine as did a lot of friends.

Anonymous wrote:Thinking about canceling Amazon Prime instead. The post staff "broke" the story about who shut down the endorsement, hate to punish them.

Agree. Cancel Amazon because Bezos is the problem. I might also cancel my Pist subscription but not sure yet.

On the flip side, if WaPo can start reporting things objectively, I might actually subscribe.

But sticking with WSJ for now.

Anonymous wrote:DH and I discussed doing so but the fact is, we are probably in the top 5% of Amazon customers, so unless we break that habit first, there’s really no point in cancelling the Post.

It’s just registering a protest. I canceled my post subscription, which I haven’t done in 20 years. Honestly I’ll probably reinstate it when the dust settles. Obviously it has no impact on anyone’s bottom line. It’s just about waiving the flag. For the newsroom, ironically, in this case, so I actually don’t want to hurt their bottom line at all.

Anonymous wrote:The billionaires are killing democracy. Same thing happened with the LA Times.

Huh,

Soros is the single largest donor to liberal Democratic politicians and their policy agendas.

Anonymous wrote:DH and I discussed doing so but the fact is, we are probably in the top 5% of Amazon customers, so unless we break that habit first, there’s really no point in cancelling the Post.

Weird logic. Hurt their bottom line where you can.

DH and I discussed doing so but the fact is, we are probably in the top 5% of Amazon customers, so unless we break that habit first, there’s really no point in cancelling the Post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never understood why news organizations endorse candidates.

Has WaPo ever endorsed a republican for president in its entire history?

Sure. They can decide to stop endorsing candidates. But choosing to stop at this particular point in time rather than a year ago or a year later? Tells me Bezos is worries about retaliation from Trumpy Trump. Coward.

Eff him. I canceled my subscription.

Agree with this. Making the decision/ announcement 10 days before the election is even more of a political statement than an endorsement. And a clear message that Jeff Bezos is afraid of Donald Trump. I’m honestly shocked by what an open sycophant he is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cancelled their WaPo subscription?

Just did. Appalling. Will they care? Who will this hurt? Certainly not Bezo’s. We are screwed. The nation and world is about to be run by 3 tyrannical (read between the lines) men.

Or PXT?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cancelled their WaPo subscription?

Just did. Appalling. Will they care? Who will this hurt? Certainly not Bezo’s. We are screwed. The nation and world is about to be run by 3 tyrannical (read between the lines) men.

TMT?