Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ladies, it's just OP not understanding English grammar.
"I'm in love with you" is not mutual just because of the "with".
Its a flowery version of "I love you."
Well aren't you being kind of bltchy today! Is anyone actually in love with you?
It's not a mutual feeling, so I don't know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ladies, it's just OP not understanding English grammar.
"I'm in love with you" is not mutual just because of the "with".
Its a flowery version of "I love you."
Well aren't you being kind of bltchy today! Is anyone actually in love with you?
Anonymous wrote:Ladies, it's just OP not understanding English grammar.
"I'm in love with you" is not mutual just because of the "with".
Its a flowery version of "I love you."

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like he's married.
My thought exactly. OP, this is a disaster in the making.
He will say it to keep the sex coming. It’s basically role play for a married guy.
This was a very hard lesson to learn.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like he's married.
My thought exactly. OP, this is a disaster in the making.
He will say it to keep the sex coming. It’s basically role play for a married guy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here- I was thinking today that probably the purpose of me being in his life at this time is not to make me happy and to get what I want but for me to support him in whatever way I can through what he is going through. I think I'm going to try to stop thinking about my feelings and focus on that.
Don’t give more than you can freely give without ever getting anything in return. It’s normal for someone going through something tough to seek reassurance that life still moves on. You may well be serving that role in his life. Whether you will have that after is completely different. I love you for him may be more like I appreciate you — not that he would similarly sacrifice to give you support.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- I was thinking today that probably the purpose of me being in his life at this time is not to make me happy and to get what I want but for me to support him in whatever way I can through what he is going through. I think I'm going to try to stop thinking about my feelings and focus on that.
Anonymous wrote:OP here- I was thinking today that probably the purpose of me being in his life at this time is not to make me happy and to get what I want but for me to support him in whatever way I can through what he is going through. I think I'm going to try to stop thinking about my feelings and focus on that.
Anonymous wrote:DP. I do think that "I'm in love with you" has a subtext of call to action (or as an explanation of action). As in, "I'm going to move mountains so that we can be together because I'm in love with you."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like he's married.
My thought exactly. OP, this is a disaster in the making.
He will say it to keep the sex coming. It’s basically role play for a married guy.
Or he’s in love with this woman and not his wife. There’s no way to tell based on what is posted.
Yeah, but she did say he can't get out of the situation and she is waiting and hoping it will work out. Classic guy leading a woman on to get sex.
Ask me how I know? (Sorry, couldn't resist given the other thread!) But this is true in my case.
99.9% of the time that’s what it is. Even happy men cheat. They compartmentalize. They aren’t going to procreate and spend 30+ years with a woman they don’t love. They are different than women in that aspect.
There's no sex going on.
So wrong. Most still have sex at home. Just like the phony Ilys—they lie about having no sex life at home too.