Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People don’t really have much cash around anymore and tvs are mounted to the walls. Laptops and tablets may be all sorts of random place and aren’t like a desk top that’s obvious and quick to grab. Phones are with the person. Jewelry obviously but at least among my friends - “real” valuable jewelry is so much less popular than for our mothers and we have little valuable jewelry beyond our rings.
I hear about bikes and strollers being stolen from open garages bc they can be a quick resell online.
Just curious what robbers actually take now that cash and tvs are out. There have been a couple attempted breakins on our street lately. We have a nice home but practically speaking our cookware is probably the most expensive thing just sitting around and I doubt they’re stealing cookware! But maybe they are?
With cameras, voice recognition technology, thumb printing, and smarter security systems, robbers are more likely to get caught than ever.
Doesn't matter when politically motivated D.A. refuse to prosecute them.
Anonymous wrote:I think you mean “thieves,” “housebreakers,” or perhaps “burglars.” “Robbery” requires force or the threat of force. It is impossible to “rob” a house.
In any event, people who break in and steal from unoccupied houses typically are looking for cash, drugs, firearms (as noted by a PP), and other easily unloaded items, but they will steal anything they can carry that they think they can sell quickly or use themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband is a LEO and he says 9.5/10 break ins are by people the homeowner knows. (I say 9.5 because there’s always that one where they can’t prove it but the homeowner has every reason to suspect the person.) The person is familiar with the home and knows what they want to take and where it is.
Does your husband say it's the cleaning service or the lawn people (or someone they are in cahoots with?)? I suspect one of those for the burglary we had at our home (they took jewelry, only jewelry).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People don’t really have much cash around anymore and tvs are mounted to the walls. Laptops and tablets may be all sorts of random place and aren’t like a desk top that’s obvious and quick to grab. Phones are with the person. Jewelry obviously but at least among my friends - “real” valuable jewelry is so much less popular than for our mothers and we have little valuable jewelry beyond our rings.
I hear about bikes and strollers being stolen from open garages bc they can be a quick resell online.
Just curious what robbers actually take now that cash and tvs are out. There have been a couple attempted breakins on our street lately. We have a nice home but practically speaking our cookware is probably the most expensive thing just sitting around and I doubt they’re stealing cookware! But maybe they are?
With cameras, voice recognition technology, thumb printing, and smarter security systems, robbers are more likely to get caught than ever.
Doesn't matter when politically motivated D.A. refuse to prosecute them.
Anonymous wrote:VCRs and the hi-fi stereo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People don’t really have much cash around anymore and tvs are mounted to the walls. Laptops and tablets may be all sorts of random place and aren’t like a desk top that’s obvious and quick to grab. Phones are with the person. Jewelry obviously but at least among my friends - “real” valuable jewelry is so much less popular than for our mothers and we have little valuable jewelry beyond our rings.
I hear about bikes and strollers being stolen from open garages bc they can be a quick resell online.
Just curious what robbers actually take now that cash and tvs are out. There have been a couple attempted breakins on our street lately. We have a nice home but practically speaking our cookware is probably the most expensive thing just sitting around and I doubt they’re stealing cookware! But maybe they are?
With cameras, voice recognition technology, thumb printing, and smarter security systems, robbers are more likely to get caught than ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does this mean that as someone who looks super healthy in a middle class house with no luxury goods around nobody will rob me?
What in the works does your appearance have to do with this?
Anonymous wrote:Does this mean that as someone who looks super healthy in a middle class house with no luxury goods around nobody will rob me?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone remember the thieves that hit Indian neighborhoods because they were looking for gold jewelry?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/01/11/burglaries-crime-tourists-target-asians/
I've always assumed they would be after drugs or jewelry. Although I disagree with OP that nobody has cash. Most people I know have an emergency stash in their house. It would just be a matter of finding it.
Anonymous wrote:VCRs and the hi-fi stereo.
Anonymous wrote:VCRs and the hi-fi stereo.