Anonymous wrote:Porn exploits women. It should be banned.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

No Republicans support sex trafficking fact

Opus Dei just got caught doing this!

Duggars?? And the Huccabees ??

Southern Baptists

He’ll Trumps illegal teen models where children he trafficked!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

I am very familiar with that thread, as I posted many examples of Dem groomers. All deleted in support of a sick agenda to mislead people about who committed these crimes. Disgusting. The moderator should be ashamed of himself.

I reported many of those because you kept reposting the same ones over and over, and then several, if you bothered to do even the barest double check, weren’t at all as you’d represented them.

We should all be opposed to Project 2025. The founders wanted a separation of church and state but the GOP looks at Afghanistan and says, ooh, yeah I like that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Last picture I saw of Puff Diddy, he didn't fit your description. At all.

You mean Trump’s associate?

Is Puff Diddy Daddy not responsible for his own behavior?

Yes, just like Donald Trump was responsible for his own behavior in choosing to associate with him

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Last picture I saw of Puff Diddy, he didn't fit your description. At all.

You mean Trump’s associate?

Is Puff Diddy Daddy not responsible for his own behavior?

Yes, just like Donald Trump was responsible for his own behavior in choosing to associate with him

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Last picture I saw of Puff Diddy, he didn't fit your description. At all.

You mean Trump’s associate?

Is Puff Diddy Daddy not responsible for his own behavior?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Last picture I saw of Puff Diddy, he didn't fit your description. At all.

You mean Trump’s associate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Last picture I saw of Puff Diddy, he didn't fit your description. At all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course, liberals support the trafficking, coercion, and exploitation of women in order to placate male sexual desire. Are you surprised by this OP?

Almost every case of trafficking, coercion and underage sex is related to religous white males. It is, again, all projection. Look up the now locked Groomers thread Google it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Porn industry is running anti-project 2025 ads in swing states. I’m guessing the Trump campaign would not have expected this.


Seventeen pornographic film actors on Monday announced that they had launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites warning that Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation blueprint for a Republican administration that has been a centerpiece of some Democratic campaigns — wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. The online ads will run in the states that will decide the presidency: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

The architects of the “hands off my porn” campaign are nothing if not aware of the polling. Vice President Kamala Harris is losing to former President Donald J. Trump among men, but younger men might be winnable — and pornographic websites are among the most heavily trafficked on the internet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/07/us/politics/porn-actors-project-2025-ad.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Q04.4RWB.sgMoHGlTh_pK&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Porn is of no benefit to those who watch it or those who are demeaned by participating in it. The lowest of the low produce it

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting. Porn industry is running anti-project 2025 ads in swing states. I’m guessing the Trump campaign would not have expected this.


Seventeen pornographic film actors on Monday announced that they had launched a $100,000 ad campaign on porn sites warning that Project 2025 — the Heritage Foundation blueprint for a Republican administration that has been a centerpiece of some Democratic campaigns — wants to ban pornography and imprison people who produce it. The online ads will run in the states that will decide the presidency: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.

The architects of the “hands off my porn” campaign are nothing if not aware of the polling. Vice President Kamala Harris is losing to former President Donald J. Trump among men, but younger men might be winnable — and pornographic websites are among the most heavily trafficked on the internet.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/07/us/politics/porn-actors-project-2025-ad.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Q04.4RWB.sgMoHGlTh_pK&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Porn is of no benefit to those who watch it or those who are demeaned by participating in it. The lowest of the low produce it