Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:12:12 poster and wanted to clarify I am saying I can not accept the lack of consequences and extreme behavior issues (regardless of IEP / 504 status).
I’m the PP you quoted. Thank you for your sincere dedication to helping all students learn. I’m in a tough spot right now, wondering if I’m going to need to pull my DC out of MCPS but honestly having no idea where else they could attend (we can’t afford McLean, etc.). A parochial school seems like a viable option but then there will be no IEP at all and that sounds like a disaster academically.
Anonymous wrote:I would like to ask that we all start making a distinction between students with IEPs and students who have behavioural problems. I understand these things are sometimes co-occurring, but they're not the same.
My MS student has an IEP and very much needs extra academic support. DC is always placed in the inclusion classes, as it should be, but the problem is that DC is grouped with a handful of students who have such pervasive behaviour problems that my kid can't focus, gets very little extra help that is effective, and is miserable due to constantly being bothered by these kids.
OP, I understand your frustration, but I don't imagine you would be bothered because my child is handed a worksheet of sentence starters to help their essay writing or is given 3 minutes of time to go through a math problem one-on-one in the corner of the classroom. The problem is not due to inclusion per se. I think you would get more positive and helpful feedback if you appreciated the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, why are the teacher and her aid spending most of the period supporting, corralling, reporting issues about five or six students with learning or behavioral disabilities?
Shouldn't they divide their time equitably?
It’s impossible. The behavior issues overwhelm them.
OP - This is a teacher problem, not a problem of MCPS or the philosophy of inclusion. There are a lot of teachers who manage their classes just fine. DC had one who could not and it was a her problem. They brought in a sub at some point and suddenly no issues. She was an anxious person and just fell apart. She probably should not have worked in special ed.
I’m glad that you feel there were not any issues once the sub was brought in, and I agree that some teachers may be anxious. However, in my 25+ years working in education, the behaviors have gotten out of control the past 10 years and have reached crisis status the past four-five years. We have multiple students at our school that are not toilet trained, need constant support to complete daily tasks and have explosive anger issues, partly because of their inability to effectively communicate (due to autism or other issues). Some of these students are identified as special needs, and some of them are not. This is at an elementary school with all Gen Ed classrooms.
It is an MCPS problem when the person from Central office in charge of special education placements denies our (identified autistic) students one on one aides and insists they do not need to go to a special program or school that will better serve their needs. In one second grade classroom at my current school, there are 3-4 students that will destroy an entire classroom (swiping books off bookshelf in 20 seconds, throw chairs, etc.), hit and kick other students, take their shoes off and throw them across the room, roll around on the floor, etc. how is the teacher supposed to handle these situations when there are students raging out? You can have the best classroom management strategies in the world with multiple incentive programs but when you are dealing with these severe behaviors in addition to multiple students having huge academic needs (not reading in 2nd grade and unable to add or subtract…thanks MCPS/Benchmark and Eureka), how can one person effectively teach and manage a class of 20+ students?
When done right, inclusion has the power to be a positive experience for all involved. However, when you combine ineffective curriculums and lack of actual consequences with students who have severe behavioral needs and students who have severe academic needs (without enough support!), you get frustrated and overwhelmed teachers and neglected neurotypical students.
Anonymous wrote:My child landed into a section of inclusion *advanced* (haha) 7th grade English. According to her, the teacher and a nice but ineffectual aid spend most of the period supporting, corralling, reporting issues about five or six students with learning or behavioral disabilities. Several of the kids are the most known issues in the school. I feel nothing but sympathy for the teacher, especially because a couple of the disabled kids are really awful. Probably the teacher is fine, but who knows. My child who is good at math, but English is not her strong suit. She feels like she can’t get any support. Were the non-disabled students specifically chosen for this class? If we talk to the counselor, could she be switched to a gen ed section?
Anonymous wrote:12:12 poster and wanted to clarify I am saying I can not accept the lack of consequences and extreme behavior issues (regardless of IEP / 504 status).
Anonymous wrote:I would like to ask that we all start making a distinction between students with IEPs and students who have behavioural problems. I understand these things are sometimes co-occurring, but they're not the same.
My MS student has an IEP and very much needs extra academic support. DC is always placed in the inclusion classes, as it should be, but the problem is that DC is grouped with a handful of students who have such pervasive behaviour problems that my kid can't focus, gets very little extra help that is effective, and is miserable due to constantly being bothered by these kids.
OP, I understand your frustration, but I don't imagine you would be bothered because my child is handed a worksheet of sentence starters to help their essay writing or is given 3 minutes of time to go through a math problem one-on-one in the corner of the classroom. The problem is not due to inclusion per se. I think you would get more positive and helpful feedback if you appreciated the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, why are the teacher and her aid spending most of the period supporting, corralling, reporting issues about five or six students with learning or behavioral disabilities?
Shouldn't they divide their time equitably?
It’s impossible. The behavior issues overwhelm them.
OP - This is a teacher problem, not a problem of MCPS or the philosophy of inclusion. There are a lot of teachers who manage their classes just fine. DC had one who could not and it was a her problem. They brought in a sub at some point and suddenly no issues. She was an anxious person and just fell apart. She probably should not have worked in special ed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, why are the teacher and her aid spending most of the period supporting, corralling, reporting issues about five or six students with learning or behavioral disabilities?
Shouldn't they divide their time equitably?
It’s impossible. The behavior issues overwhelm them.
Anonymous wrote:But, why are the teacher and her aid spending most of the period supporting, corralling, reporting issues about five or six students with learning or behavioral disabilities?
Shouldn't they divide their time equitably?
Anonymous wrote:In MCPS they always have an extra teacher IME and they are typically smaller classes to begin with.