Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Totally fine for a teen. They are old enough to make choices and live with the consequences. A few talks with the police might actually help.
That teen could hurt or kill someone else. Its not the police's job to talk to your kid. That's a parenting responsibility and you need to step up and parent your kids.
Anonymous wrote:Totally fine for a teen. They are old enough to make choices and live with the consequences. A few talks with the police might actually help.
Anonymous wrote:free-range parenting is sort of irresponsible by default, isn't it? So yeah, this is irresponsible.
I think the question you tried to answer in the OP is "is this problematic?" and my answer would be "it depends".
If you're okay with the possible outcomes of turning your kid loose, including arrests, permanent record, serious harm, then go for it. Should your kid be everyone else's responsibility? I guess that depends on who you ask, but ultimately, we're responsible for each other. That's part of being in a society.
Thing is, if I find your punkass kid first, they're going to learn a lesson or six you obviously didn't teach them at home. No squealing from you, no "that's so unfair" and no jumping in to defend your kid. If you want it done your way, do it yourself. If you're not going to do the job, you've got to accept that, on a long enough timeline, someone else will probably have to, and it might not play out the way you'd hoped for your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid has known issues respecting safety rules and adults generally, should you watch them more closely at public events, or do you just unleash them onto the world?
You may feel entitled to dump your destructive sociopathic s**thead onto your local public school, or shove cash over to some parochial private for some special attention, but outside of school, do you think it's fair to the rest of us to let him out of your sight, knowing he'll likely go wreak havoc all around, hoping it won't come back to you?
I think you don't understand some truly difficult mental health disorders?
Sometimes there is no solution, OP. Some parents are literally killed by their mentally ill children. Some parents have to renounce their guardianship of their own bio kid so that they can be institutionalized by the state, in order to not live in fear in their own homes, and in order for their other children to feel safe. It takes a while to get there.
I take it you're not ranting about some run-of-the-mill kid behavior.
Even assuming we are talking about that strawman of "truly difficult mental health disorder" in a tween, you do think it's ok to free-range that kid?
Sorry, I can't talk to someone who uses that word in the context of serious mental disorders.
Right. You're inventing/projecting the context of serious mental disorder. That is what makes it a strawman. I'm referring to destructive sociopathic shithead tweens. You should assume that 'sociopathic', when apposed to 'shithead' is as much hyperbole and frustration as it is a wild diagnostic guess.
No, it’s not okay. Most kids aren’t like this at all but for the rare few who are just s$$theads, yes their parents should keep a closer eye on them. We live in a neighborhood of families. The majority of kids, with helicoptering parents or free range parents, are completely fine. There are two families (out of hundreds) who have a kid who is trouble. One is a mean mean girl and the other is a mean bullying boys. Both sets of parents seem fine, both have siblings who seem fine. But a lot of us wish their parents would keep a closer eye on those kids.
What do these kids do, OP?