Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feed your dog food that meets WSAVA guidelines. They aren't all expensive.
WSAVA is sponcon. Your vet is sponsored by a dog food brand, too. While the science aspects may be okay, the branding part should NOT be overlooked.
It is a myth that vets get kickbacks for recommending certain dog foods.
Hot horseshit, when you see how many have science diet and royal canin literally in their offices. You think they buy that themselves?
They also sell medication, and I don't think that's a scam either.
I don't actually know if my vet's office sells nonprescription dog food because I get it delivered. And all my vets have ever asked about food or meds is what my dog is getting, because they do not care where I buy it.
Maybe you should get a vet you trust.
Maybe you should take a closer look at the wall-o-food in your vet's office and ask yourself why it's on display like that. You brought up meds: are those equally promoted? If not (and they're not), why do you suppose that is.
Vets run a business. I trust them to make healthcare recommendations for my pets AND I recognize hustle when I see it. These things are, unfortunately, not mutually-exclusive.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have kids.
I feed my 38lb collie mix a mostly raw food diet, some commercial raw beef blend (Albright's), some canned sardines, some grocery store chicken quarters - with frozen spinach and blueberries, baby carrots, apples and eggs to supplement. Other appropriate fruits and veggies as snacks when in season.
I spend around $65/mo to feed her, but it's worth every penny because she is in excellent health and her dentition is terrific for her age (6) as is her body condition, not an ounce of extra fat and she is fast and very athletic.
My philosophy is same as for humans - food is the first medicine and the right diet can save thousands in veterinary care costs down the line. I spent very little for her two yearly wellness visits, she doesn't get tons of yearly unnecessary vaccinations she has the core plus rabies and the required boosters of those, she takes monthly parasitic preventative. I pay for insurance so if she has an accident or major illness cost isn't a factor in how I choose to treat her.
She really, really loves her food - it's a joy to see and it always makes me feel a little badly about the dogs I fed kibble because the vets said that was best. It's not best, no more so than it is best for humans to eat diets heavy in ultra processed foods. Fresh and whole foods is what our guts evolved to as ideal diet and the same is true of canids.
Anonymous wrote:Our dog lived to 16 and change (expected lifespan was 12 years) on Orijen adult then orijen senior. It was expensive. But we were cautioned to switch several times by our vet because grain free kibble is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. We never did, because we had gone through several food changes that caused him issues and he did really well on orijen. What’s the current thinking?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feed your dog food that meets WSAVA guidelines. They aren't all expensive.
WSAVA is sponcon. Your vet is sponsored by a dog food brand, too. While the science aspects may be okay, the branding part should NOT be overlooked.
It is a myth that vets get kickbacks for recommending certain dog foods.
Hot horseshit, when you see how many have science diet and royal canin literally in their offices. You think they buy that themselves?
They also sell medication, and I don't think that's a scam either.
I don't actually know if my vet's office sells nonprescription dog food because I get it delivered. And all my vets have ever asked about food or meds is what my dog is getting, because they do not care where I buy it.
Maybe you should get a vet you trust.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feed your dog food that meets WSAVA guidelines. They aren't all expensive.
WSAVA is sponcon. Your vet is sponsored by a dog food brand, too. While the science aspects may be okay, the branding part should NOT be overlooked.
It is a myth that vets get kickbacks for recommending certain dog foods.
Hot horseshit, when you see how many have science diet and royal canin literally in their offices. You think they buy that themselves?
Anonymous wrote:Don't get me started. Our 115lb dog eats 6 cups of Purina Pro Plan kibble (for sensitive stomachs) every day.
We buy 2, 35lb bags at a time. We can afford it, but s#!ts expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Don't get me started. Our 115lb dog eats 6 cups of Purina Pro Plan kibble (for sensitive stomachs) every day.
We buy 2, 35lb bags at a time. We can afford it, but s#!ts expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Feed your dog food that meets WSAVA guidelines. They aren't all expensive.
WSAVA is sponcon. Your vet is sponsored by a dog food brand, too. While the science aspects may be okay, the branding part should NOT be overlooked.
It is a myth that vets get kickbacks for recommending certain dog foods.
Anonymous wrote:Our dog lived to 16 and change (expected lifespan was 12 years) on Orijen adult then orijen senior. It was expensive. But we were cautioned to switch several times by our vet because grain free kibble is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. We never did, because we had gone through several food changes that caused him issues and he did really well on orijen. What’s the current thinking?