Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol so many bitter snobs on this thread.
I was thinking the same
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Now imagine how POC feel knowing that the vast majority of AOs are white.
Guilt-ridden whites who think they already have enough asians.
These white AOs are trying their best to get as many URM in the doors as possible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school hosted a panel with eight AOs, mostly well-known/brand-name schools plus a couple of in-state. They gave the expected answers to questions like, how do you view test scores, using AI in essays, that kind of thing. My big takeaway: the AOs mostly seemed well-meaning but frankly not all that bright. It was like, oh, THIS is who makes these big decisions about my kid? Frankly one that stood out as most impressive was the in-state rep. Anyway, I'm not sure what my point is, it's not like I really thought AOs were a bunch of Harvard MBAs but it was still eye-opening.
AOs usually are people who fell into the role after college (often lesser known college) by working their way up in admissions after other career paths stalled. They are usually nice, people-oriented people but few have intellectual gravitas or are as impressive as the kids they are judging and sometimes rejecting. Most are middle-class and went to lesser known schools and not A students with slates of impressive ECs themselves. The heads of admission at Georgetown, Emory and a few others are exceptions.
It's useful perspective for our kids to know they're being judged by people with lesser credentials and accolades than they have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Now imagine how POC feel knowing that the vast majority of AOs are white.
Guilt-ridden whites who think they already have enough asians.
These white AOs are trying their best to get as many URM in the doors as possible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Now imagine how POC feel knowing that the vast majority of AOs are white.
Guilt-ridden whites who think they already have enough asians.
These white AOs are trying their best to get as many URM in the doors as possible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Now imagine how POC feel knowing that the vast majority of AOs are white.
Guilt-ridden whites who think they already have enough asians.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that women are overrepresented as AOs, which raises concerns about the evaluation of male applicants.
Now imagine how POC feel knowing that the vast majority of AOs are white.
Anonymous wrote:How would you all feel if your brilliant young adults told you they wanted to pursue a career in admissions?
Anonymous wrote:Not sure having a bunch of Harvard MBAs in the process would improve things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AOs I've met, granted they have been more senior, have impressive undergrad degrees (often from the school they now represent).
On campus, most of the few junior people we were in contact with had also attended the school.
+1
Honestly, it seems like someone in this thread is trying to preemptively soothe themselves by saying the forthcoming rejections are coming from stupid people.
It’s not rational.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The AOs I've met, granted they have been more senior, have impressive undergrad degrees (often from the school they now represent).
On campus, most of the few junior people we were in contact with had also attended the school.
+1
Honestly, it seems like someone in this thread is trying to preemptively soothe themselves by saying the forthcoming rejections are coming from stupid people.
It’s not rational.
Anonymous wrote:Lol so many bitter snobs on this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school hosted a panel with eight AOs, mostly well-known/brand-name schools plus a couple of in-state. They gave the expected answers to questions like, how do you view test scores, using AI in essays, that kind of thing. My big takeaway: the AOs mostly seemed well-meaning but frankly not all that bright. It was like, oh, THIS is who makes these big decisions about my kid? Frankly one that stood out as most impressive was the in-state rep. Anyway, I'm not sure what my point is, it's not like I really thought AOs were a bunch of Harvard MBAs but it was still eye-opening.
AOs usually are people who fell into the role after college (often lesser known college) by working their way up in admissions after other career paths stalled. They are usually nice, people-oriented people but few have intellectual gravitas or are as impressive as the kids they are judging and sometimes rejecting. Most are middle-class and went to lesser known schools and not A students with slates of impressive ECs themselves. The heads of admission at Georgetown, Emory and a few others are exceptions.
It's useful perspective for our kids to know they're being judged by people with lesser credentials and accolades than they have.