Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the data and results his own?
Were the results correct and methodology sound?
He plagarized from an Australian person's website - did he also plagarize the results and the methodology? If he got the introduction from somewhere else, where did he get the substance of the report? If you can blame his co-author, did he actually do any of the writing himself or just fraudulently attach his name?
Most importantly, all of us who do the work ourselves but constantly feel we are not good enough, how do we get the chutzpah to apply to be a university president?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
He confessed.
"While I am steadfast that our results, data and findings are sound, I acknowledge recurrent language in the introductory sections.”
He copied a few pages of background material.
Does that change the core of the paper? No.
Was it a cowardly and dishonest way to fill space and set the context of the paper? Yes.
Is it claiming credit for someone else's expository work? Yes.
What message does this send to UMD students? If he plagiarized and apologized, and still retains his position, that's a terrible message to the students. He needs to step down.
-parent of UMD student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the data and results his own?
Were the results correct and methodology sound?
He still plagiarized. He should've given credit to the quotes when he used the words verbatim.
Our MS kids even know to do that. Stop making excuses for liars.
Remember how people were outraged when Melania Trump plagiarized parts of Michelle Obama's speech?
This is worse because he's in academia, leading a college where academic dishonesty can get you kicked out of college.
Anonymous wrote:Who knew UMCP was so much like Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe we're taking this idea of plagiarism thing too far. It really is a construct of system built on oppression and the old ideas of academic honesty might be ripe for a new paradigm where the oppressors aren't the perpetual rule-makers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
I think MIT gave Neri Oxman a free pass around the same time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is the data and results his own?
Were the results correct and methodology sound?
He still plagiarized. He should've given credit to the quotes when he used the words verbatim.
Our MS kids even know to do that. Stop making excuses for liars.
Remember how people were outraged when Melania Trump plagiarized parts of Michelle Obama's speech?
This is worse because he's in academia, leading a college where academic dishonesty can get you kicked out of college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
This is not MIT’s fault. This happened way back in 2002. Plagiarism detectors did not exist back then. Someone would have had to notice this copying from ann obscure website and turn him in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
No, he was a professor at UMD since 1992, during all of his known plagiarism incidents.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darryll_Pines
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
This is not MIT’s fault. This happened way back in 2002. Plagiarism detectors did not exist back then. Someone would have had to notice this copying from ann obscure website and turn him in.