Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, your “to be fair” isn’t fair at all. Harris was indeed at the Capitol on January 6th — and that has been documented.
As to your concern about “voters (being) better off, that’s an overly general question, that you’re asking about millions of people. Some are, some aren’t. You have no idea what Harris thinks, and her view is likely more nuanced than yours. For example, people with health insurance thanks to the ACA are clearly “better off” in her view, while women and girls losing rights with respect to health care and abortion are clearly not better off in her view.
I think it’s weird that your posing as someone asking “fair” questions of Harris — when clearly you’re being anything but “fair” as well as either uninformed or posing as though you’re uninformed in the guise of asking questions about the moderators’ supposed “interests”.
The “better off” question was specifically addressing economically better off.
But nice spin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.
According to Politico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505
I mean if you were “at the twin towers” at 6am on 9/11, but across town at another location when the planes actually hit, would you pipe in three years later with “…I was there at the towers on 9/11 and it was very scary…people DIED!!”
Or would you agree that this would be quite misleading and that this statement would give people the false impression that you were actually there when the events that “9/11” is known for were going down?
She obviously said it that way to give the impression that she was present at the time that the crowd was entering the Capitol, but she wasn’t. She clearly wants to elevate her position to that of a “witness” to the events when that’s completely false.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.
According to Politico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505
Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whats worse - David Muir fact checking Trump 6 times or David Muir fact checking Harris 0 times?
What should he have fact checked Harris on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.
According to Politico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505
I mean if you were “at the twin towers” at 6am on 9/11, but across town at another location when the planes actually hit, would you pipe in three years later with “…I was there at the towers on 9/11 and it was very scary…people DIED!!”
Or would you agree that this would be quite misleading and that this statement would give people the false impression that you were actually there when the events that “9/11” is known for were going down?
She obviously said it that way to give the impression that she was present at the time that the crowd was entering the Capitol, but she wasn’t. She clearly wants to elevate her position to that of a “witness” to the events when that’s completely false.
Guess who said he was there at 9/11?
Anonymous wrote:Whats worse - David Muir fact checking Trump 6 times or David Muir fact checking Harris 0 times?
Anonymous wrote:They were not impartial moderators.
They were part of Team Harris and they went after Trump while failing to correct any of Kamala’s misrepresentations.
Anonymous wrote:Whats worse - ABC giving 100% positive coverage to Harris or ABC giving 93% negative coverage to Trump?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, your “to be fair” isn’t fair at all. Harris was indeed at the Capitol on January 6th — and that has been documented.
As to your concern about “voters (being) better off, that’s an overly general question, that you’re asking about millions of people. Some are, some aren’t. You have no idea what Harris thinks, and her view is likely more nuanced than yours. For example, people with health insurance thanks to the ACA are clearly “better off” in her view, while women and girls losing rights with respect to health care and abortion are clearly not better off in her view.
I think it’s weird that your posing as someone asking “fair” questions of Harris — when clearly you’re being anything but “fair” as well as either uninformed or posing as though you’re uninformed in the guise of asking questions about the moderators’ supposed “interests”.
The “better off” question was specifically addressing economically better off.
But nice spin.
Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was a fixed debate. Kamala cheated with ear pieces.
I suspect she may have been given the questions ahead of time allowing her plenty of time to rehearse her scripted answers. The moderators were a joke and totally biased towards her. It was 3 against 1 yesterday.
It’s not that hard to figure out on your own what the questions will be about! Plus she’s smart and prepared herself unlike Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought they did a great job fact-checking Trump. And, to be fair, a non-existent job of fact checking Harris. And obviously had no interest in pressing her to give a straight answer when she dodged the “do you think voters are better off than they were four years ago?” Question (she doesn’t, but they don’t want to make her SAY that) and when she avoided answering whether she supports limits on abortion in 7th, 8th, 9th month (she doesn’t, but again they don’t want to make her SAY that).
But did anyone think it was weird that they said nothing when she claimed to have been at the Capitol on Jan 6 when she was actually at DNC headquarters???
Why would she say she was there?? And why wouldn’t the moderators correct her in that assertion?
Actually, she WAS at the Capitol on January 6. She was ALSO other places on that day.
According to Politico.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/04/doj-kamala-harris-jan-6-519505
Ah—but you had to look it up, didn’t you?
I bet this is the first time you knew that she wasn’t there. And is t it odd that she wasn’t there? Why not? Wasn’t she meant to be present at the Capitol? What was she doing at the DNC headquarters and why doesn’t anyone ever ask her about it?
Is no one curious?
The standards you hold her to vs Trump are absurd! Did you know in the US doctors are allowed to abort/murder full term babies born alive? /s.
Just look up with Governor Northam said. He is a doctor. He said what Trump described. It’s on video. It is real and it was the whole truth out load. Hard core abortion rights people believe a mother should have complete choice to eliminate her child the entire term and upon birth. She wasn’t forced to admit she wants no restrictions but that he has view. But don’t act like he lied. Northam said those things.
Kamala just killed a 78 y/o baby.