Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are more concerned about the security of mass produced products than people being murdered by the government, you're not going to get sympathy.

Speak for yourself. Looting, assault, attempted murder, and arson aren't exactly doing wonders for civilization. To you it's a bunch of gucci bags. To others it's a breakdown in the rules and norms and public order that human beings need for society to function safely for everyone. I hope "The Government" prosecutes these people hard.

+1

It hurts the businesses in those areas (including employees who work there and people who shop there). It negatively affects residents and tourists who want to enjoy the area. It creates a downward spiral of crime. Insurance premiums go up for all sorts of businesses. Police officers (who aren’t all evil despite some narratives) are putting their own safety in danger.

But it feels good to try to act morally superior by making this about consumerism so people will tout this garbage while patting themselves heartily on the back.

ok, MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

yeah I have a hard time feeling sorry for him … there are plenty of examples of police misconduct but he seems like he made a series of bad choices that led him to this point. likely drunk driving, passes out in a moving vehicle with an illegal gun on his lap …

+1. He was so drunk he drove into a McDonald’s with a gun in his lap. Then he rolled down his window and tried to grab the officer’s gun?
At some point I don’t know what we are asking officers to do. Just allow people to drive around drunk and crash into buildings? Ask people to surrender and if they don’t, just walk away or allow themselves to be shot? No wonder we have massive shortages in police hiring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

yeah I have a hard time feeling sorry for him … there are plenty of examples of police misconduct but he seems like he made a series of bad choices that led him to this point. likely drunk driving, passes out in a moving vehicle with an illegal gun on his lap …

+1. He was so drunk he drove into a McDonald’s with a gun in his lap. Then he rolled down his window and tried to grab the officer’s gun?
At some point I don’t know what we are asking officers to do. Just allow people to drive around drunk and crash into buildings? Ask people to surrender and if they don’t, just walk away or allow themselves to be shot? No wonder we have massive shortages in police hiring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

yeah I have a hard time feeling sorry for him … there are plenty of examples of police misconduct but he seems like he made a series of bad choices that led him to this point. likely drunk driving, passes out in a moving vehicle with an illegal gun on his lap …

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

Anonymous wrote:Here's some background on "violence interruptor" Justin:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-district-men-plead-guilty-charges-killing-man-southeast-washington

"Robinson pled guilty to assault with intent to kill"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can I contribute to a bail fund for these protestors like I did last time?

Can you start by explain how this counts as a "protest?" What did Gucci do that they are protesting?

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why you guys are saying "protest," is there any evidence there was a protest involved? I get the sense it's just people who were reporting on it on Twitter and were confused?

Anonymous wrote:How can I contribute to a bail fund for these protestors like I did last time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are more concerned about the security of mass produced products than people being murdered by the government, you're not going to get sympathy.

Speak for yourself. Looting, assault, attempted murder, and arson aren't exactly doing wonders for civilization. To you it's a bunch of gucci bags. To others it's a breakdown in the rules and norms and public order that human beings need for society to function safely for everyone. I hope "The Government" prosecutes these people hard.

+1

It hurts the businesses in those areas (including employees who work there and people who shop there). It negatively affects residents and tourists who want to enjoy the area. It creates a downward spiral of crime. Insurance premiums go up for all sorts of businesses. Police officers (who aren’t all evil despite some narratives) are putting their own safety in danger.

But it feels good to try to act morally superior by making this about consumerism so people will tout this garbage while patting themselves heartily on the back.

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop using the word protest when it is a crime spree and not a protest?