Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

No you are stupid and a traitor and a dummy.

Trump is Putin full on how do you not get that by now. There is no excuse at all for anyone to vote for trump.

I am not a Cheney fan she protected Ginni and she lies about after birth abortions however Cheney is not washed up she is Republican royalty. But dummies like you even after last night when Benny Jackson Tim Pool and two others have been proven they are Russian propaganda you got nothing!

There is no Republican Party it is the party of Putin.

Now Americans are going to suffer again when they shut the government down for Don the con.

Find your dam brain cells if you stand with the Dictator that will rob you blind and never leave office you are unamerican to the core and utterly brain dead.

There is no reality Trump is nothing g but a traitor to the US

And I hope to god that Jack Smiths filing under seal last night gets him good and he rots away.

And i sincerely hope if Trump is installed you idiots get all that’s coming to you. I’m safe I’m the 1percent you are not and like I said I hope you lose every thing you will.

Anonymous wrote:Not only Cheney, but Putin as well

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-claims-russia-supports-kamala-harris-joe-biden-us-presidential-election-russia-1949132

Anyone who believes Putin is an I.D.I.O.T.

Not only Cheney, but Putin as well

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-claims-russia-supports-kamala-harris-joe-biden-us-presidential-election-russia-1949132

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

You’ve got the order wrong. Cheney didn’t become a “washed up” politician and then take on Trump to become relevant; she was one of the most powerful House Republicans until she condemned Trump’s attempted coup. That ended her political career because the cult members turned on her. She has nothing personal to gain from endorsing Harris. She’s now persona non grata to Republicans and she’s not electable as a Democrat, nor does she want to be a Democrat. She disagrees with Harris on policy, but recognizes the threat that Trump poses. There’s no other circumstance that would cause her to endorse Harris.

Agree with this. I would add that I am seeing more articles about gop discussion re getting beyond Trump. Who knows. But Cheney is young enough to be playing to lead a resurrected post-trump gop. She’ll need an existing democracy for that plan to take her to potus. And as a Cheney she is a well trained politician.

She can’t win a Republican primary election. I am a Republican-leaning independent, and I wouldn’t vote for her for any reason. You must be a Democrat, because we don’t like Cheney. Someone who endorsed a far-left Democrat for President is unelectable in any Republican primary election.

So you think your vote is the only one that counts in a Republican primary? You might want to see a doctor about your delusions of grandeur.

No, the Republican voters of Wyoming already voted and overwhelmingly rejected her. She wasn’t serving their interests in Congress, just pursuing her anti-Trump agenda. She is not going to win any Republican primary. Endorsing a Democrat like Kamala Harris for President is the death knell any type of candidacy.

this is very true, but it shows you that she is more interested in saving the country than saving her political career.

So, OP is right.. Thank you Liz Cheney for putting country over party, even as despise your father.

-former R

Just a few years ago

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

You’ve got the order wrong. Cheney didn’t become a “washed up” politician and then take on Trump to become relevant; she was one of the most powerful House Republicans until she condemned Trump’s attempted coup. That ended her political career because the cult members turned on her. She has nothing personal to gain from endorsing Harris. She’s now persona non grata to Republicans and she’s not electable as a Democrat, nor does she want to be a Democrat. She disagrees with Harris on policy, but recognizes the threat that Trump poses. There’s no other circumstance that would cause her to endorse Harris.

Agree with this. I would add that I am seeing more articles about gop discussion re getting beyond Trump. Who knows. But Cheney is young enough to be playing to lead a resurrected post-trump gop. She’ll need an existing democracy for that plan to take her to potus. And as a Cheney she is a well trained politician.

She can’t win a Republican primary election. I am a Republican-leaning independent, and I wouldn’t vote for her for any reason. You must be a Democrat, because we don’t like Cheney. Someone who endorsed a far-left Democrat for President is unelectable in any Republican primary election.

So you think your vote is the only one that counts in a Republican primary? You might want to see a doctor about your delusions of grandeur.

No, the Republican voters of Wyoming already voted and overwhelmingly rejected her. She wasn’t serving their interests in Congress, just pursuing her anti-Trump agenda. She is not going to win any Republican primary. Endorsing a Democrat like Kamala Harris for President is the death knell any type of candidacy.

Anonymous wrote:How many Americans did her dad get killed looking for WMDs that weren't there?

What Liz Cheney fails to realize is that it was the screw up of her father and the other "conventional" Republicans that led to the rise of Trump in the first place.

I dont' know about you, but I try not to impose the sins of the father onto the children.

- Former R who left the party due to Dick Cheney's actions.

Anonymous wrote:
The “Russian Collusion” “WMD in Iraq” “j6” nutcase who lost her election by a historic margin endorsement of Harris proves Trump is the right choice.

Racists neo nazis and Russians endorsing Trump proves Harris is the right choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

cheney never advocated for over throwing our election results; Trump did. He is the greatest threat to this country, and a Russian stooge, per the intelligence community.

Anonymous wrote:She’s a war hack. Trump is far better than her

... for the Russians, yes.

How many Americans did her dad get killed looking for WMDs that weren't there?

What Liz Cheney fails to realize is that it was the screw up of her father and the other "conventional" Republicans that led to the rise of Trump in the first place.

Anonymous wrote:It's not country over party. It's realignment of parties. I said this years ago on this board and was told I didn't know what I was talking about, however it's only gotten more clear. At a high level overview, it's war-loving neocon establishment (D) vs anti-war anti-establishment (R).

I don't think this is the axis on which the realignment has occurred. So odd.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

You’ve got the order wrong. Cheney didn’t become a “washed up” politician and then take on Trump to become relevant; she was one of the most powerful House Republicans until she condemned Trump’s attempted coup. That ended her political career because the cult members turned on her. She has nothing personal to gain from endorsing Harris. She’s now persona non grata to Republicans and she’s not electable as a Democrat, nor does she want to be a Democrat. She disagrees with Harris on policy, but recognizes the threat that Trump poses. There’s no other circumstance that would cause her to endorse Harris.

Agree with this. I would add that I am seeing more articles about gop discussion re getting beyond Trump. Who knows. But Cheney is young enough to be playing to lead a resurrected post-trump gop. She’ll need an existing democracy for that plan to take her to potus. And as a Cheney she is a well trained politician.

She can’t win a Republican primary election. I am a Republican-leaning independent, and I wouldn’t vote for her for any reason. You must be a Democrat, because we don’t like Cheney. Someone who endorsed a far-left Democrat for President is unelectable in any Republican primary election.

So you think your vote is the only one that counts in a Republican primary? You might want to see a doctor about your delusions of grandeur.

The “Russian Collusion” “WMD in Iraq” “j6” nutcase who lost her election by a historic margin endorsement of Harris proves Trump is the right choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. That’s how much of a threat Donald Trump is to America; Liz Cheney is endorsing Kamala Harris. Four years ago, this was unthinkable.

She’s a washed up politician with no future in the Republican Party, just like all the other “Republicans” who have endorsed Harris. None are in office. Republican voters have solidly rejected Cheney. Her only future is as a commentator on a liberal media channel as their pet “Republican”, just like Kinzinger. She is doing this out of her own self-interest and to try to stay relevant.

Anyway, Cheney and her warmongering are far more dangerous than Trump is.

You’ve got the order wrong. Cheney didn’t become a “washed up” politician and then take on Trump to become relevant; she was one of the most powerful House Republicans until she condemned Trump’s attempted coup. That ended her political career because the cult members turned on her. She has nothing personal to gain from endorsing Harris. She’s now persona non grata to Republicans and she’s not electable as a Democrat, nor does she want to be a Democrat. She disagrees with Harris on policy, but recognizes the threat that Trump poses. There’s no other circumstance that would cause her to endorse Harris.

Agree with this. I would add that I am seeing more articles about gop discussion re getting beyond Trump. Who knows. But Cheney is young enough to be playing to lead a resurrected post-trump gop. She’ll need an existing democracy for that plan to take her to potus. And as a Cheney she is a well trained politician.

She can’t win a Republican primary election. I am a Republican-leaning independent, and I wouldn’t vote for her for any reason. You must be a Democrat, because we don’t like Cheney. Someone who endorsed a far-left Democrat for President is unelectable in any Republican primary election.