Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The two accidents seemed too connected to be coincidence, but I didn't follow through to get any details or learn if foul play was suspected in either incident.
In other words, you think one of the people involved can control the weather?
Most marine experts agree that that weather event wouldn’t have been sufficient to sink a boat that size unless there was something else going on.
Link?
Suitably weasel worded: "most" and "experts." Usually that means two people who have seen a boat from a distance and run a YouTube channel.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg343vjwklo.amp
The experts don't support the idea that the weather couldn't sink the boat. Did you post the right link to the right experts?
But experts have told the BBC that this was likely a "black swan" occurrence of freak weather - and that no-one is necessarily at fault.
Anonymous wrote:What pretentious git named this boat? Sad
Anonymous wrote:The name isn’t the problem. It was that the mast had to be the tallest single mast in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, her of course. But the ship builders are Italian and I think the likelihood that Italian investigators lean to protect them and pin it on a foreign crew will be high. Ask Amanda Knox
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The two accidents seemed too connected to be coincidence, but I didn't follow through to get any details or learn if foul play was suspected in either incident.
In other words, you think one of the people involved can control the weather?
Most marine experts agree that that weather event wouldn’t have been sufficient to sink a boat that size unless there was something else going on.
Link?
Suitably weasel worded: "most" and "experts." Usually that means two people who have seen a boat from a distance and run a YouTube channel.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg343vjwklo.amp
But experts have told the BBC that this was likely a "black swan" occurrence of freak weather - and that no-one is necessarily at fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The two accidents seemed too connected to be coincidence, but I didn't follow through to get any details or learn if foul play was suspected in either incident.
In other words, you think one of the people involved can control the weather?
Most marine experts agree that that weather event wouldn’t have been sufficient to sink a boat that size unless there was something else going on.
Link?
Suitably weasel worded: "most" and "experts." Usually that means two people who have seen a boat from a distance and run a YouTube channel.
Anonymous wrote:Also, what is up with Hewlett Packard now going after the widow?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The two accidents seemed too connected to be coincidence, but I didn't follow through to get any details or learn if foul play was suspected in either incident.
In other words, you think one of the people involved can control the weather?
Most marine experts agree that that weather event wouldn’t have been sufficient to sink a boat that size unless there was something else going on.
Link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t crew quarters generally below guest suites? How did most of the crew survive but the guests did not?
It was around 4am, so guests were in cabins, crew on deck due to the storm. The chef was sleeping because chefs are off duty at night, so he died too. The captain should have been at dock and not out during the storm. Is it possible the guest insisted on it despite captain's advice? Sure. Still terrible and it made me have more respect for Captain Sandy on Below Deck: she will tell the guests she's staying at dock despite protests and them being very upset, to avoid situations like these.
Anonymous wrote:Aren’t crew quarters generally below guest suites? How did most of the crew survive but the guests did not?