Anonymous wrote:My experience with ChatGPT led me to stop using it for any kind of questioning because I didn't trust the answers. I asked it a lot of questions on my particular field of expertise and wow, it gave some doozies. Many of the inaccuracies would have been hard for a non-expert to figure out.
I personally love to write so would have no use for it to write things for me but I assume that is a big appeal to many.
It can be fun for joke requests like to write a poem in the style of Emily Dickinson but in pirate jargon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish people better understood how this stuff works. It's not smart: it's basically predictive text, but with an incredibly high environmental cost. If you are using it to find lesson plan ideas or whatever, why not just Google search - why add the ChatGPT layer?
I feel like i should know wht you mean but don't - you mean that it costs in storage space?
Presumably they mean power consumption.
I swear Im not being intntionally obtuse - can you please elaborate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish people better understood how this stuff works. It's not smart: it's basically predictive text, but with an incredibly high environmental cost. If you are using it to find lesson plan ideas or whatever, why not just Google search - why add the ChatGPT layer?
I feel like i should know wht you mean but don't - you mean that it costs in storage space?
Presumably they mean power consumption.
I swear Im not being intntionally obtuse - can you please elaborate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish people better understood how this stuff works. It's not smart: it's basically predictive text, but with an incredibly high environmental cost. If you are using it to find lesson plan ideas or whatever, why not just Google search - why add the ChatGPT layer?
I feel like i should know wht you mean but don't - you mean that it costs in storage space?
Presumably they mean power consumption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish people better understood how this stuff works. It's not smart: it's basically predictive text, but with an incredibly high environmental cost. If you are using it to find lesson plan ideas or whatever, why not just Google search - why add the ChatGPT layer?
I feel like i should know wht you mean but don't - you mean that it costs in storage space?
Anonymous wrote:I wish people better understood how this stuff works. It's not smart: it's basically predictive text, but with an incredibly high environmental cost. If you are using it to find lesson plan ideas or whatever, why not just Google search - why add the ChatGPT layer?
Anonymous wrote:Email drafting and rewriting. I tend to be long winded so ask to shorten the message.
Employee evaluations - used Claude and ChatGPT for this. I had the basic text and just asked them to beef it up.
ChatGPT - used the color analysis - it was ok and gave some decent choices
Anonymous wrote:Translating my dogs barks into English.