Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder how much the teachers union pushed for this to streamline their work. This cuts down on the number of retakes and I bet will also cut down on the number of students that ask for extra help to learn a subject better. Regardless of who pushed for this, it seems like a windfall for teachers that wanted less work. I also bet the number of students who have some sort of grading grievance, even informally, will increase since that would be their only path to a remedy where before a teacher could just say they should retake it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder how much the teachers union pushed for this to streamline their work. This cuts down on the number of retakes and I bet will also cut down on the number of students that ask for extra help to learn a subject better. Regardless of who pushed for this, it seems like a windfall for teachers that wanted less work. I also bet the number of students who have some sort of grading grievance, even informally, will increase since that would be their only path to a remedy where before a teacher could just say they should retake it.
How many retakes did you take when you were in school?
Anonymous wrote:https://dcps.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dcps/publication/attachments/Secondary%20Grading%20and%20Reporting%20Policy%20-%20English.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder how much the teachers union pushed for this to streamline their work. This cuts down on the number of retakes and I bet will also cut down on the number of students that ask for extra help to learn a subject better. Regardless of who pushed for this, it seems like a windfall for teachers that wanted less work. I also bet the number of students who have some sort of grading grievance, even informally, will increase since that would be their only path to a remedy where before a teacher could just say they should retake it.
How many retakes did you take when you were in school?
Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder how much the teachers union pushed for this to streamline their work. This cuts down on the number of retakes and I bet will also cut down on the number of students that ask for extra help to learn a subject better. Regardless of who pushed for this, it seems like a windfall for teachers that wanted less work. I also bet the number of students who have some sort of grading grievance, even informally, will increase since that would be their only path to a remedy where before a teacher could just say they should retake it.
Anonymous wrote:I have to wonder how much the teachers union pushed for this to streamline their work. This cuts down on the number of retakes and I bet will also cut down on the number of students that ask for extra help to learn a subject better. Regardless of who pushed for this, it seems like a windfall for teachers that wanted less work. I also bet the number of students who have some sort of grading grievance, even informally, will increase since that would be their only path to a remedy where before a teacher could just say they should retake it.
Anonymous wrote:Last year, my kid had a teacher who capped grades for any retake at 86.
The 86% ceiling for late work applies to revision work and work submitted late due to unexcused absences, with the rationale that on-time submission should be incentivized. "
https://dcps.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dcps/publication/attachments/Secondary-Grading-and-Reporting-Policy-8621.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this policy, the one thing I will say is that it's a weird, abrupt change to make mid-stream on the same kids. It will make it look like some kids suddenly became much worse students in a way that isn't actually accurate.
We barely figured it out for last year (6th) and now it all changed for 7th, which is an important year for HS admissions. I don’t think the policy is crazy but they already made very, very little effort to help kids with organization and the system is a morass of confusing platforms (I think I counted 16). A massive change like this w/out support is really unfair. This also connects to the insufficient home-school communication caused by the lack of a clear homework-classwork-test feedback cycle. I see NOTHING in terms of completed work …
Have you asked for it?
I’m a teacher who uses mostly paper so that kids can study from them and take them home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this policy, the one thing I will say is that it's a weird, abrupt change to make mid-stream on the same kids. It will make it look like some kids suddenly became much worse students in a way that isn't actually accurate.
We barely figured it out for last year (6th) and now it all changed for 7th, which is an important year for HS admissions. I don’t think the policy is crazy but they already made very, very little effort to help kids with organization and the system is a morass of confusing platforms (I think I counted 16). A massive change like this w/out support is really unfair. This also connects to the insufficient home-school communication caused by the lack of a clear homework-classwork-test feedback cycle. I see NOTHING in terms of completed work …
7th is not an important year for college admissions. I hope that was some kind of typo and not evidence that you’re insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this policy, the one thing I will say is that it's a weird, abrupt change to make mid-stream on the same kids. It will make it look like some kids suddenly became much worse students in a way that isn't actually accurate.
We barely figured it out for last year (6th) and now it all changed for 7th, which is an important year for HS admissions. I don’t think the policy is crazy but they already made very, very little effort to help kids with organization and the system is a morass of confusing platforms (I think I counted 16). A massive change like this w/out support is really unfair. This also connects to the insufficient home-school communication caused by the lack of a clear homework-classwork-test feedback cycle. I see NOTHING in terms of completed work …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this policy, the one thing I will say is that it's a weird, abrupt change to make mid-stream on the same kids. It will make it look like some kids suddenly became much worse students in a way that isn't actually accurate.
We barely figured it out for last year (6th) and now it all changed for 7th, which is an important year for HS admissions. I don’t think the policy is crazy but they already made very, very little effort to help kids with organization and the system is a morass of confusing platforms (I think I counted 16). A massive change like this w/out support is really unfair. This also connects to the insufficient home-school communication caused by the lack of a clear homework-classwork-test feedback cycle. I see NOTHING in terms of completed work …
Anonymous wrote:I fully agree with this policy, the one thing I will say is that it's a weird, abrupt change to make mid-stream on the same kids. It will make it look like some kids suddenly became much worse students in a way that isn't actually accurate.
Anonymous wrote:I hope the teachers are still flexible if there is confusion with deadlines, which I feel like there frequently is