Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's NSA, Chief of Staff, Vice President and many other cabinet members have refused to endorse Trump, but Trump got two whackaloon former Democrats to endorse him and that's supposed to mean something.

Exactly. Gabbard was never a real democrat and she made that official in a statement a few years ago when she "left" the party. She grew up in a fringe cult and took a lot of money from Assad to put a pretty face on his killing regime. She's not in her right mind and very corrupt.

Kennedy junior is just a joke, despite his last name.

If anything, this is the sign that Trump is in a death spiral.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.

Why in the world do you think a *speech* from ANYONE (let alone from one whose opinion means nothing to me), suddenly make me vote for garbage like Trump? You think a speech erases who HE is? Any endorsement doesn’t suddenly make Trump look good, it makes the endorser look really, really bad. The man is disgusting and anyone who endorses him, even more so. And don’t assume I expect this nobody to endorse Harris, because I don’t. You don’t have to love Harris, you can even loathe her, I don’t care. However, when you proactively cheer on filth like Trump, you’re indecent and despicable, regardless of party.

Anonymous wrote:Trump's NSA, Chief of Staff, Vice President and many other cabinet members have refused to endorse Trump, but Trump got two whackaloon former Democrats to endorse him and that's supposed to mean something.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/26/tulsi-gabbard-endorses-donald-trump

Latest news also saying she will be campaigning for Trump.

This and RFK is a great step forward. A real political coalition of Democrats and Republicans.

I like Tulsi and while I don’t agree with her on some things, the way the Clinton machine and the DNC tried to paint her as a Russian stooge - which we know was false - left a bad taste in my mouth.

Harris is toast . She can’t debate, no policy positions, wants to debate and use notes, constant word salads when asked tough questions, not even voted in. Too many red flags for me.

A Trump, Vance, Kennedy, Gabbard administration would be so great for the country.

Anonymous wrote:Ok so…

JFK cheating on Jackie was fine.

Ted Kennedy killing Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick was fine.

But RFK JR teaming up with Donald Trump to save America from fascism is a bridge too far for the Kennedy family to cross?

Help me understand?

Anonymous wrote:What a clown car.

Anonymous wrote:Ok so…

JFK cheating on Jackie was fine.

Ted Kennedy killing Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick was fine.

But RFK JR teaming up with Donald Trump to save America from fascism is a bridge too far for the Kennedy family to cross?

Help me understand?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.

Why in the world do you think a *speech* from ANYONE (let alone from one whose opinion means nothing to me), suddenly make me vote for garbage like Trump? You think a speech erases who HE is? Any endorsement doesn’t suddenly make Trump look good, it makes the endorser look really, really bad. The man is disgusting and anyone who endorses him, even more so. And don’t assume I expect this nobody to endorse Harris, because I don’t. You don’t have to love Harris, you can even loathe her, I don’t care. However, when you proactively cheer on filth like Trump, you’re indecent and despicable, regardless of party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.

Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.

She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…

Nope. The government of Ukraine has placed her on a list of people who are spreading disinformation for Russia. She's bad news, through and through.
https://theweek.com/ukraine/1015428/ukraine-accuses-tulsi-gabbard-and-rand-paul-of-promoting-russian-propaganda

She is on record as claiming the US and Russia are "not so different" on freedom of speech, which is utterly bizarre as a belief.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/tulsi-gabbard-falsely-claimed-the-us-is-not-so-different-from-russia-on-freedom-of-speech/

Her anti-US claims are being rebroadcast as Russian news propaganda.
https://theintercept.com/2022/02/24/russian-tv-uses-tucker-carlson-tulsi-gabbard-sell-putins-war/

Alexander Vindman called her out as an instrument of the Russian government.
https://www.newsweek.com/vindman-calls-gabbard-agent-russian-disinformation-after-fox-segment-1733443

She held a private meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, during his repeated war crimes against civilians, without any official designation.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats

We can do this all day, PP. If you want to keep posting in support of Gabbard, you just invite detailed criticism in return -- and with receipts.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why he was at the DNC when they cheated him out of a nomination twice and he knows it

Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.

Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.

She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…