Anonymous wrote:
Firstly, the word is archaic
https://www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Firstly
Secondly, on a positive note, this helps prove the letter was not written by ChatGPT, so that's a plus, right?
Anonymous wrote:I have trouble taking a person seriously who uses the word "firstly" in a business letter.
Anonymous wrote:GDS HS parent here. There has been much dissatisfaction with her from students, parents, and especially her own faculty.
I’m guessing the somewhat clunky or defensive tone comes from this. She has felt under attack the last two years.
Regardless the welcome back letter is not the place for this. Perhaps her job is under threat?
Whoever wrote this - Yom or AI Yom or hybrid - seems like they are under pressure
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not OP - but I ran GDS high school principal (not Head of School) welcome letter through GPTzero and got approx 80 percent likely composed by LLM
Not a surprise at all for this extremely low caliber high school head. She also compared herself to Gandhi and Mother Theresa in the letter. Like them, she faces lots of criticism. Not kidding at all BTW
It seems oddly defensive which gives the letter an off tone. Doesn’t seem to fit the welcome to school vibe that one would expect at the start of the school year.
Really poor interpretation of what was actually said. Give it a break.
I’m not PP but I think you can get the true point of the letter and still chuckle at PPs joke about Ghandi and Mother Theresa. I will agree with PP that the letter was a bit off - even if you appreciate the most basic of its intended message.
I agree w/ you. It was poorly written - even if the LLM wrote it! She ties the " I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone" immediately to "the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa"
Sloppy/clumsy at best
+ +
here is the segment so the "give it a rest" person above can try to defend
At GDS, we strive to create a positive experience for everyone, and it's natural to feel disheartened when well-intentioned actions are met with anything less than steadfast approval.
However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions.
Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not OP - but I ran GDS high school principal (not Head of School) welcome letter through GPTzero and got approx 80 percent likely composed by LLM
Not a surprise at all for this extremely low caliber high school head. She also compared herself to Gandhi and Mother Theresa in the letter. Like them, she faces lots of criticism. Not kidding at all BTW
Really poor interpretation of what was actually said. Give it a break.
I’m not PP but I think you can get the true point of the letter and still chuckle at PPs joke about Ghandi and Mother Theresa. I will agree with PP that the letter was a bit off - even if you appreciate the most basic of its intended message.
I agree w/ you. It was poorly written - even if the LLM wrote it! She ties the " I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone" immediately to "the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa"
Sloppy/clumsy at best
+ +
here is the segment so the "give it a rest" person above can try to defend
At GDS, we strive to create a positive experience for everyone, and it's natural to feel disheartened when well-intentioned actions are met with anything less than steadfast approval.
However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions.
Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.
I tried to leave the letter with the grace to take away what I thought was the intended message -- but it iss hard to "un-see" the odd tone and the fact that it reads more like a reflective and defensive letter about herself. It was not what I would have expected for a "welcome back to school" letter (especially when it is the first communication for incoming 9th grade families).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t bother me. If it frees the principal up to do the other 20,000 things he needs to get done, then fine.
If it is forbidden for students to use, then it's hypocritical.
No it isn't hypocritical at all.
Students need to do their own writing because they are at school, in part, to learn to write. That's not why the principal is there.
It's like saying I am hypocritical because I'd be upset if my kid's personal trainer lifted weights while my kid sat and watched, but I used movers to lift my boxes the last time I moved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t bother me. If it frees the principal up to do the other 20,000 things he needs to get done, then fine.
If it is forbidden for students to use, then it's hypocritical.
No, it isn't. Totally different purposes. There are always different rules for kids v. adults. Students are supposed to be learning by doing, and making mistakes, and learning from the mistakes. Second graders could use a calculator to do their fast fact worksheets, but then they aren't learning. No one says it is hypocritical for adults to use calculators. Same with other tools that make life quicker and easier after you've already learned the basic skills. Learn to form your letters before using a keyboard. Learn to do calculations by long hand before using a calculator. Learn to write a strong sentence, paragraph, 5-paragraph essay, creative writing text, etc., before using AI editors.