Anonymous wrote:For the example given - UCLA - Gonzaga had the best result - 3 students admitted out of 17 applicants. Sidwell had 3 admitted out of 27 and School Without Walls had 5 out of 27.
Anonymous wrote:For the example given - UCLA - Gonzaga had the best result - 3 students admitted out of 17 applicants. Sidwell had 3 admitted out of 27 and School Without Walls had 5 out of 27.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect that the typical 3.6-3.7 GPA kid at a Big 3 would have a 4.4+ GPA if they were at Jackson-Reed. No matter what anyone says, the reality is that the inflated public school GPA will yield much better college admissions results than the GPA at the median of an elite high school.
If your kid wants top grades, I would recommend a decently rigorous, but not overwhelming high school. Schools like Bullis, St. Andrews, Gonzaga, St. John's, etc. all fit this description well.
What leads you to believe this? It strikes me as one person's opinion (without any info as to why they believe these things). This person took a hop on the old jump to conclusions mat.
Because I've seen the level of work that gets a B+ at Sidwell and the level of work that gets an A/A+ at Jackson-Reed. Many families have one kid at both and will outright admit that the public schools hand out A's like candy, especially post-COVID.
Same experience. The fact our complacent big3 hasn’t responded to this inflation, choosing instead to just gaslight parents, is what is making us reconsider our investment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect that the typical 3.6-3.7 GPA kid at a Big 3 would have a 4.4+ GPA if they were at Jackson-Reed. No matter what anyone says, the reality is that the inflated public school GPA will yield much better college admissions results than the GPA at the median of an elite high school.
If your kid wants top grades, I would recommend a decently rigorous, but not overwhelming high school. Schools like Bullis, St. Andrews, Gonzaga, St. John's, etc. all fit this description well.
What leads you to believe this? It strikes me as one person's opinion (without any info as to why they believe these things). This person took a hop on the old jump to conclusions mat.
Because I've seen the level of work that gets a B+ at Sidwell and the level of work that gets an A/A+ at Jackson-Reed. Many families have one kid at both and will outright admit that the public schools hand out A's like candy, especially post-COVID.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect that the typical 3.6-3.7 GPA kid at a Big 3 would have a 4.4+ GPA if they were at Jackson-Reed. No matter what anyone says, the reality is that the inflated public school GPA will yield much better college admissions results than the GPA at the median of an elite high school.
If your kid wants top grades, I would recommend a decently rigorous, but not overwhelming high school. Schools like Bullis, St. Andrews, Gonzaga, St. John's, etc. all fit this description well.
What leads you to believe this? It strikes me as one person's opinion (without any info as to why they believe these things). This person took a hop on the old jump to conclusions mat.
Anonymous wrote:I suspect that the typical 3.6-3.7 GPA kid at a Big 3 would have a 4.4+ GPA if they were at Jackson-Reed. No matter what anyone says, the reality is that the inflated public school GPA will yield much better college admissions results than the GPA at the median of an elite high school.
If your kid wants top grades, I would recommend a decently rigorous, but not overwhelming high school. Schools like Bullis, St. Andrews, Gonzaga, St. John's, etc. all fit this description well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh? Have you seem the instagrams for the Big3 and compared them to other schools adjusted for numbers?
UC's are an exception, I will grant you that, but state schools in the other 49 states, and private schools in all 50 states, take kids from Big3's all the time.
I personally know kids at these schools that ended up at places like Michigan, NYU, Tufts, Wesleyan, etc. (all amazing colleges). But, these same kids were definitely Ivy material if they weren't applying from within the cutthroat applicant pool of these prep schools.
It's not uncommon at all to see kids in their senior year openly say "I would have a better shot at an Ivy if I weren't applying from Sidwell/NCS/STA, etc." The competition to get into an Ivy from these schools is extremely fierce because applicants are compared to others from their same school.
Anonymous wrote:Your example - UCLA - is random and specific. I would love to know how many kids from this entire area, not just Big 3, went to UCLA last year and I am guessing it’s not a lot?? Maybe see which school sent the most there and then reassess. I have literally no idea even what type of school here sends kids to UCLA so if you do find this out, let us know.