Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who should decide this?
The people in the countries where the safaris are.
Fortunately, that is the way it works.
I don't even understand what you are saying. The people in the countries with the safaris should decide whether safaris are ethical or not? That does not make sense -- everyone has to decide for themselves whether an activity meets their own ethical standards. If the people of Botswana are like "we are all very happy with the safari ethics in our country" but OP's DH is not then the safaris are not ethical according to his standards and it doesn't matter what people in Botswana think.
Also you are assuming there is consensus in these countries regarding safari tourism and there very much is not. Every country that offers safaris has people who oppose them and people who support them. And people make both ethical and unethical arguments both in favor and against safaris. Safaris bring in money and create employment and can increase understanding and awareness of both environmental and cultural and political issues in these countries. But sometimes the safari companies are mostly taking profits out of the country and underpay or mistreat the people employed in Africa. Some safari companies are terrible and engage in awful environmental practices. Some safari visitors are respectful of their host countries and behave well. Some very much do not. Some of the countries that host safaris have racism and oppression of certain ethnicities and the benefits of safari tourism are kept from those communities and hoarded.
It's not so simple as "Well if this is something someone in Kenya or South Africa or Botswana is willing to offer then it must be ethical and broadly viewed that way in these countries." It varies by country and can vary by company and region and practice.
The fact that you don’t understand does not make the logic any less valid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who should decide this?
The people in the countries where the safaris are.
Fortunately, that is the way it works.
I don't even understand what you are saying. The people in the countries with the safaris should decide whether safaris are ethical or not? That does not make sense -- everyone has to decide for themselves whether an activity meets their own ethical standards. If the people of Botswana are like "we are all very happy with the safari ethics in our country" but OP's DH is not then the safaris are not ethical according to his standards and it doesn't matter what people in Botswana think.
Also you are assuming there is consensus in these countries regarding safari tourism and there very much is not. Every country that offers safaris has people who oppose them and people who support them. And people make both ethical and unethical arguments both in favor and against safaris. Safaris bring in money and create employment and can increase understanding and awareness of both environmental and cultural and political issues in these countries. But sometimes the safari companies are mostly taking profits out of the country and underpay or mistreat the people employed in Africa. Some safari companies are terrible and engage in awful environmental practices. Some safari visitors are respectful of their host countries and behave well. Some very much do not. Some of the countries that host safaris have racism and oppression of certain ethnicities and the benefits of safari tourism are kept from those communities and hoarded.
It's not so simple as "Well if this is something someone in Kenya or South Africa or Botswana is willing to offer then it must be ethical and broadly viewed that way in these countries." It varies by country and can vary by company and region and practice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know who should decide this?
The people in the countries where the safaris are.
Fortunately, that is the way it works.
I don't even understand what you are saying. The people in the countries with the safaris should decide whether safaris are ethical or not? That does not make sense -- everyone has to decide for themselves whether an activity meets their own ethical standards. If the people of Botswana are like "we are all very happy with the safari ethics in our country" but OP's DH is not then the safaris are not ethical according to his standards and it doesn't matter what people in Botswana think.
Also you are assuming there is consensus in these countries regarding safari tourism and there very much is not. Every country that offers safaris has people who oppose them and people who support them. And people make both ethical and unethical arguments both in favor and against safaris. Safaris bring in money and create employment and can increase understanding and awareness of both environmental and cultural and political issues in these countries. But sometimes the safari companies are mostly taking profits out of the country and underpay or mistreat the people employed in Africa. Some safari companies are terrible and engage in awful environmental practices. Some safari visitors are respectful of their host countries and behave well. Some very much do not. Some of the countries that host safaris have racism and oppression of certain ethnicities and the benefits of safari tourism are kept from those communities and hoarded.
It's not so simple as "Well if this is something someone in Kenya or South Africa or Botswana is willing to offer then it must be ethical and broadly viewed that way in these countries." It varies by country and can vary by company and region and practice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you go with a local, ethically managed safari company like the one my friend runs in Tanzania, I can't imagine a less destructive vacation.
She previously worked at a non-profit that had quite a bit of ethical tourism and she oversaw the program.
Could safaris be unethical? Yes.
But it's not the same as voluntourism which is basically taking day labor jobs from locals. It's about learning about another part of the world, seeing nature, and giving money to a likely impoverished local economy. All good things to do.
I'd have more ethical concerns about the flight over.
What’s your friend’s company? I went to Tanzania long ago and am thinking of planning another trip soon!
It's Tanzania Choice Safaris:
https://tanzaniachoicesafaris.com/
Anonymous wrote:You can go with Natural Habitat Adventures. They’re partnered with the World Wildlife Fund. Some of their profits go to conservation and they’re very conscientious about respecting the wildlife and environment. They’re also very expensive though.
https://www.nathab.com/africa/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you go with a local, ethically managed safari company like the one my friend runs in Tanzania, I can't imagine a less destructive vacation.
She previously worked at a non-profit that had quite a bit of ethical tourism and she oversaw the program.
Could safaris be unethical? Yes.
But it's not the same as voluntourism which is basically taking day labor jobs from locals. It's about learning about another part of the world, seeing nature, and giving money to a likely impoverished local economy. All good things to do.
I'd have more ethical concerns about the flight over.
What’s your friend’s company? I went to Tanzania long ago and am thinking of planning another trip soon!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you go with a local, ethically managed safari company like the one my friend runs in Tanzania, I can't imagine a less destructive vacation.
She previously worked at a non-profit that had quite a bit of ethical tourism and she oversaw the program.
Could safaris be unethical? Yes.
But it's not the same as voluntourism which is basically taking day labor jobs from locals. It's about learning about another part of the world, seeing nature, and giving money to a likely impoverished local economy. All good things to do.
I'd have more ethical concerns about the flight over.
What’s your friend’s company? I went to Tanzania long ago and am thinking of planning another trip soon!
Anonymous wrote:You know who should decide this?
The people in the countries where the safaris are.
Fortunately, that is the way it works.
Anonymous wrote:Achingly politically correct attempt.
Anonymous wrote:Is it unethical to travel anywhere?
As for safaris, like anything else, it depends. There are many different kinds, many different tour operators, many different accommodations. You can choose locally owned operations who try to abide by certain standards, particularly out of respect for the animals and their habitats, and stay at lodges that are community-owned and are indeed the center and support of a community. Do a lot of research.
If this isn’t a troll post (kind of seems designed for an argument)…his pronouncement that safaris are “unethical” is silly. I’m sure some are, some aren’t. Some travel to Europe is unethical. But it’s weird to think that safaris are particularly unethical, given that many local people, who run their own companies aimed at showing people the stunning wildlife in their communities, are not doing it in a way that is ethical and responsible.