Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Anonymous wrote:I'd love that division. I really like seeing the meets against those teams. And the parents are nice!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Overlee as the current clear third probably wouldn’t be so happy.
OKM parents and coaches have been suggesting this idea/solution all season. What a fun division that would be!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Overlee as the current clear third probably wouldn’t be so happy.
OKM parents and coaches have been suggesting this idea/solution all season. What a fun division that would be!!
*Edit (sorry, I don’t know how to make in-text changes): The suggested division of DR, Highlands, Langley, OKM, Crosspointe, and KG would be such fun!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Overlee as the current clear third probably wouldn’t be so happy.
Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Anonymous wrote:Really they should put Tuckahoe, Overlee, and Chesterbrook in their own division and they can race each other twice and be as obnoxious as the like to be to each other
Then put Donaldson Run, Highlands, OKM, Crosspointe, Langley, and Kent Gardens together
Everyone would be happier
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teams do not decide if they get to move up or down. They fill out a seeding survey. The NVSL determines who moves up or down. You find out at the seeding meeting. OKM or some other team doesn't get to "decline" to be in division 1.
But the seeding survey asks what division you think you should be in, and NVSL can weigh that answer heavily in their decision.
Also, the factor that folks aren’t discussing are the virtual meets. The seeding survey asks which meet was most representative of your team and then they can use those meets to run virtual meets between teams. I understand that those results can heavily sway the seeding committee.
If virtual meets really matter, we should see Ravensworth Farm (D8) make a big jump. They are very STRONG against the adjacent division champions.
vs. D4 champion; Ravensworth Farm 209 - Little Hunting Park 206
vs. D5 champion; Ravensworth Farm 212 - Pinecrest 208
vs. D6 champion; Ravensworth Farm 236 - Fairfax 184
vs. D7 co-champion; Ravensworth Farm 223 - Rolling Hills 197
vs. D7 co-champion; Ravensworth Farm 243 - Parklawn 177
* All virtual meets based on July 13, 2024 results
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do virtual meets work? Do they take the best times from the season across all events, or is it the best meet from Team A vs the best meet from Team B? This is new to me, just curious. Thanks.
You can tinker with it here:
https://www.mynvsl.com/virtual-meet