Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically a bunch of generic mish-mosh that "both sides" can read as they want.

Sorry, Project2025 is the agenda. That is what the public needs to understand.

The neocon Bush-Heritage Foundation committed fraud by attaching Trump's name to their desired policies, many of those policies happen to be "Americans LAST".

81% of Project 25’s creators held formal roles in Trump’s presidency. Trump’s, not Bush’s.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/trump-project-2025?CMP=share_btn_url

Project 25 has serial traitors like Ken Cucinelli on its board. It's no ally to Trump and likely a hostile movement intended to harm him.

Hahahahahahahaha. That's why he appointed Ken Cuccinelli to his administration last time?

Anonymous wrote:I am Queens just like Trump. I always find it funny when people notably from Southern States think that Trump is this hard right conservative. He is not. Trump is far more liberal than a lot of GOP voters namely those on the far right want to believe. All Trump cares about is praise. Trump will have no problem passing a bill mandating pronoun use if said bill will bring praise and worship. That's all the man cares about.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically a bunch of generic mish-mosh that "both sides" can read as they want.

Sorry, Project2025 is the agenda. That is what the public needs to understand.

The neocon Bush-Heritage Foundation committed fraud by attaching Trump's name to their desired policies, many of those policies happen to be "Americans LAST".

81% of Project 25’s creators held formal roles in Trump’s presidency. Trump’s, not Bush’s.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/trump-project-2025?CMP=share_btn_url

Project 25 has serial traitors like Ken Cucinelli on its board. It's no ally to Trump and likely a hostile movement intended to harm him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf

OP here with some context. There are two significant departures from standard Republican positions on abortion and same-sex marriage, in response to Trump's requests that the language be softened to attract more voters.

"The Republican Party’s current policy platform, unchanged since 2016 after the party skipped the platform process during the pandemic in 2020, says the GOP supports a “human life amendment” to the U.S. Constitution. The proposed changes this year say that the 14th Amendment inherently offers protections for life at conception and that “states are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights.” It represents a significant switch for the Republican Party, which has been grappling with how to handle its stance on abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, pitting social conservatives against figures more worried about the political implications of the party’s position.

On same-sex marriage, the Trump-aligned platform committee also approved changes opposed by social conservative in the party. The new proposed platform removes language that says marriage is 'between one man and one woman, and is the foundation for a free society'. It was replaced by language that says the party instead promotes a “culture that values the Sanctity of Marriage, the blessing of childhood, the foundational role of family, and supports working parents.” The new proposed platform does not include mention of 'one man and one woman'."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-pushes-new-gop-platform-softening-partys-positions-abortion-sex-rcna160730

I can get behind this.

Sure thats great for you. But why do you feel the need to make these national-level policies? This is the problem with Christian Nationalism. Its not about you or your beliefs, its about dominance and power and making others adhere to your beliefs which is hypocrisy at its finest because most Christians dont even follow their own rules.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf

All crap. I would love to see manufacturing jobs and all outsourced jobs come back to the US if for no other reason than English would be the mother tongue of customer service reps and manufacture would have to pay $15/hr instead of screwing poor people in China, Philippines, and India by paying them "piece work".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So basically a bunch of generic mish-mosh that "both sides" can read as they want.

Sorry, Project2025 is the agenda. That is what the public needs to understand.

The neocon Bush-Heritage Foundation committed fraud by attaching Trump's name to their desired policies, many of those policies happen to be "Americans LAST".

81% of Project 25’s creators held formal roles in Trump’s presidency. Trump’s, not Bush’s.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/trump-project-2025?CMP=share_btn_url

Project 25 has serial traitors like Ken Cucinelli on its board. It's no ally to Trump and likely a hostile movement intended to harm him.

Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf

Great, from now on, quote from this platform and NOT Project 2025.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is good that Trump is moving the GOP to the left on abortion. The right should focus on advocating for their side having 3+ kids instead of putting so much energy into restricting abortions for the pro-choice folks.

Again for some of you in the back: There’s no “moving to the left” on abortion policy. The GOP’s interpretation is that the 14th Amendment protects embryos, and that’s a de jure and de facto ban on abortion, IVF, certain forms of contraception and who knows what else they can dream up.