Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

DP. You seem overwrought, as usual. I agree with the PP. Neither of these candidates is ideal, but one of them most definitely belongs in assisted living - not pretending to “president.”

And the other belongs in prison. So. Pick your poison. I’m voting for the platform. Sounds like you are a Republican who doesn’t care about abortion rights, the environment, our relationship with NATO, or tariffs that will destroy our economy. There is nothing that will change either of our votes.

DP
LOL.
"Voting the platform."
It's tough to vote for a person who you know isn't cognitively capable of holding the job and if elected, will likely not be in that role in 4 years.

I'm voting the platform too. The Republican platform. And, I am voting for the person that I know can carry through on that platform.
I would much rather have a person who has proven he can oversee a booming economy, energy dominance, job growth, peace in the Middle East, a secure border, and will cut burdensome regulations.
I

You're voting for Obama?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

DP. You seem overwrought, as usual. I agree with the PP. Neither of these candidates is ideal, but one of them most definitely belongs in assisted living - not pretending to “president.”

And the other belongs in prison. So. Pick your poison. I’m voting for the platform. Sounds like you are a Republican who doesn’t care about abortion rights, the environment, our relationship with NATO, or tariffs that will destroy our economy. There is nothing that will change either of our votes.

DP
LOL.
"Voting the platform."
It's tough to vote for a person who you know isn't cognitively capable of holding the job and if elected, will likely not be in that role in 4 years.

I'm voting the platform too. The Republican platform. And, I am voting for the person that I know can carry through on that platform.
I would much rather have a person who has proven he can oversee a booming economy, energy dominance, job growth, peace in the Middle East, a secure border, and will cut burdensome regulations.
I

Anonymous wrote:

Terrible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

He's a "felon". Okay. If you actually think that he defrauded a bank-- a bank that testified that they were in no way harmed-- then okay.

He is a convicted felon.
He is a convicted sec offender (paying 60 million in damages)
He bankrupted:
a casino (yes a casino)
an airline
a university (paying $25 million in damages)
His company (paying 9 figures in damages)

I could go on but won't bother because it is a cult.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

He's a "felon". Okay. If you actually think that he defrauded a bank-- a bank that testified that they were in no way harmed-- then okay.

He’s also stiffed many small businesses- fact.
He’s also a declared rapist - fact
He also wrongly took and refused many requests over months to return them, keeping them in a bathroom - fact
He also refused to participate in the peaceful transition of power - fact
He also ran several of his own businesses to the ground and was held responsible for a fraudulent “university” - fact
He also cheated on all three of his wives - fact
He also has promised to get revenge on his perceived enemies if re-elected - fact

This is your idea of a suitable person to run our nation? Disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is this what people want?

Member countries to pay their fair share? You bet it is. Why don’t YOU want them to?

They are, because Obama started the process in 2014.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

DP. You seem overwrought, as usual. I agree with the PP. Neither of these candidates is ideal, but one of them most definitely belongs in assisted living - not pretending to “president.”

And the other belongs in prison. So. Pick your poison. I’m voting for the platform. Sounds like you are a Republican who doesn’t care about abortion rights, the environment, our relationship with NATO, or tariffs that will destroy our economy. There is nothing that will change either of our votes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

He's a "felon". Okay. If you actually think that he defrauded a bank-- a bank that testified that they were in no way harmed-- then okay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

DP. You seem overwrought, as usual. I agree with the PP. Neither of these candidates is ideal, but one of them most definitely belongs in assisted living - not pretending to “president.”

The other one belongs in jail.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.

DP. You seem overwrought, as usual. I agree with the PP. Neither of these candidates is ideal, but one of them most definitely belongs in assisted living - not pretending to “president.”

Anonymous wrote:

Is this what people want?

Member countries to pay their fair share? You bet it is. Why don’t YOU want them to?

Anonymous wrote:

So many lies in this post.

Obama started the path for NATO countries to expand their military budgets to a minimum of their national budget, not Trump.
Trump implies there is some sort of NATO bank that money "pours" into. That isn't how it works.
Yes, other presidents did something about those "delinquiencies" including his predecessor.
The Secretary General never made any such statement and has publicly said so.
The US is not paying the most money to support Ukraine.
Biden didn't need to ask, because the other countries ARE paying more and giving more in arms and other support.

Every year, the United States sends billions of dollars in aid—much more than any other country—to beneficiaries around the world in pursuit of its security, economic, and humanitarian interests.

Since Russia’s invasion in February 2022, Ukraine has become far and away the top recipient of U.S. foreign aid. This marks the first time that a European country has held the top spot since the Harry S. Truman administration directed vast sums into rebuilding the continent through the Marshall Plan after World War II.


How much money has the United States provided Ukraine?

Since the war began, the U.S. Congress has voted through five bills that have provided Ukraine with ongoing aid, doing so most recently in April 2024. The total budget authority under these bills—the “headline” figure often cited by news media—is $175 billion.

It’s important to note that of the $175 billion total, only $107 billion directly aids the government of Ukraine. Most of the remainder is funding various U.S. activities associated with the war in Ukraine, and a small portion supports other affected countries in the region

https://www.cfr.org/article/how-much-us-aid-going-ukraine

The United States is giving Ukraine the most money.

So many lies in this post.

Obama started the path for NATO countries to expand their military budgets to a minimum of their national budget, not Trump.
Trump implies there is some sort of NATO bank that money "pours" into. That isn't how it works.
Yes, other presidents did something about those "delinquiencies" including his predecessor.
The Secretary General never made any such statement and has publicly said so.
The US is not paying the most money to support Ukraine.
Biden didn't need to ask, because the other countries ARE paying more and giving more in arms and other support.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:European here. You don't get it. NATO leaders arrived full of trepidation that he was going to wander like at the G7 summit, or be totally lost and confused like at the debate. So they were relieved when he was able to *read* through a speech and not trip on stage (he did that once).

But it won't be enough to get him elected.

Our complicit media had caused irreparable damage to the office of our president and our nation overall by covering for Biden.

Democrats aren’t even ashamed they are supporting a man who needs to be in a nursing home, or living quietly at home with his family. They want him to be in charge for 4 more years.

Oh hon don’t come here spouting about the shame in supporting one candidate when the other candidate is a g. d. felon who is completely unsuited to the job of being president. It is entirely shameful that this nation might return such an unethical dangerous anti-democratic ignoramus to the Oval Office. Shame shame shame on all who would vote for the rapist who plans to do to our democracy what he’s done to dozens of women.