Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is OP. This has been really helpful. I think the people suggesting state/national park tours near a city are onto something that will work for us. I do want to see and enjoy some unique nature but not at the expense of more cities.
I can't relate to thinking NY, Chicago, and SF are the only cities worth vacationing in but someone do say that to me in person too. π
What about Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philly, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Columbus, Cleveland, Tulsa, Atlanta, LA, Portland OR, St. Louis, Wilmington DE, Charlotte, Greensboro, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, Nashville, etc., etc.? Pretty much the only U.S. city I haven't really enjoyed is San Diego.
Curious, what didn't you like about it?
Anonymous wrote:Cleveland plus Cuyahoga valley national Park seems perfect for you! Also Detroit is really fun and you should go. If you have nice weather, biking dequindre cut and by the river could be nice...I think you can rent bikes. Also definitely go to the Henry Ford museum and eat middle eastern food in Dearborn!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do what you want. Are you trying to keep up for social media?
Hahaha π€£ I don't even have Instagram. This was from some people I've talked to who spend weeks at these places but I (no joke) would really love to go to Detroit.
I'm not dragging the family to Detroit anytime soon, but if I go to all the U.S. cities I want to go to, I'll run out of time and money and youth to go to the national parks. Wondering if I should mix it up because I don't know what I'm missing.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. This has been really helpful. I think the people suggesting state/national park tours near a city are onto something that will work for us. I do want to see and enjoy some unique nature but not at the expense of more cities.
I can't relate to thinking NY, Chicago, and SF are the only cities worth vacationing in but someone do say that to me in person too. π
What about Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philly, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Columbus, Cleveland, Tulsa, Atlanta, LA, Portland OR, St. Louis, Wilmington DE, Charlotte, Greensboro, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, Nashville, etc., etc.? Pretty much the only U.S. city I haven't really enjoyed is San Diego.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. This has been really helpful. I think the people suggesting state/national park tours near a city are onto something that will work for us. I do want to see and enjoy some unique nature but not at the expense of more cities.
I can't relate to thinking NY, Chicago, and SF are the only cities worth vacationing in but someone do say that to me in person too. π
What about Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philly, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Columbus, Cleveland, Tulsa, Atlanta, LA, Portland OR, St. Louis, Wilmington DE, Charlotte, Greensboro, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, Nashville, etc., etc.? Pretty much the only U.S. city I haven't really enjoyed is San Diego.
Anonymous wrote:This is OP. This has been really helpful. I think the people suggesting state/national park tours near a city are onto something that will work for us. I do want to see and enjoy some unique nature but not at the expense of more cities.
I can't relate to thinking NY, Chicago, and SF are the only cities worth vacationing in but someone do say that to me in person too. π
What about Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philly, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Columbus, Cleveland, Tulsa, Atlanta, LA, Portland OR, St. Louis, Wilmington DE, Charlotte, Greensboro, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, Nashville, etc., etc.? Pretty much the only U.S. city I haven't really enjoyed is San Diego.