Anonymous wrote:People: this is what OP is asking:
Do you think this could go wrong or help her college applications?
OP is not asking if it is dishonest or if she should retitle it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:URM favoritism is banned, so a moot point anyways.
Wrong. It is banned based on race alone. Race as part of the lived experience is - permissible thing to consider.
I love your logic. According to those who favored AA, URMs needed a leg up because they faced a lack of opportunity.
In reality, though, today nearly all opportunities (like this internship) are for URMs only. We all know this when our children were looking for opportunities. As this thread shows, even if there is the - extremely rare - opportunity that allows applications by non-URMs, in the end, your child ends up in a URM-labeled program.
Now, with the SCOTUS decision, AOs are no longer allowed to look at race (as a sign of being disadvantaged), but they are allowed to look at participation in URM-only opportunities like this internship. So participation in URM-only internships has no become a sign of "lived experience" - presumably, the lived experience of being selected because of race for opportunities others aren't generally offered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:URM favoritism is banned, so a moot point anyways.
Wrong. It is banned based on race alone. Race as part of the lived experience is - permissible thing to consider.
I love your logic. According to those who favored AA, URMs needed a leg up because they faced a lack of opportunity.
In reality, though, today nearly all opportunities (like this internship) are for URMs only. We all know this when our children were looking for opportunities. As this thread shows, even if there is the - extremely rare - opportunity that allows applications by non-URMs, in the end, your child ends up in a URM-labeled program.
Now, with the SCOTUS decision, AOs are no longer allowed to look at race (as a sign of being disadvantaged), but they are allowed to look at participation in URM-only opportunities like this internship. So participation in URM-only internships has no become a sign of "lived experience" - presumably, the lived experience of being selected because of race for opportunities others aren't generally offered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:URM favoritism is banned, so a moot point anyways.
Wrong. It is banned based on race alone. Race as part of the lived experience is - permissible thing to consider.
Anonymous wrote:Of course she shouldn’t give up a prestigious internship because its administration is being merged with a program for URM. It’s still basically the same opportunity ands she still had to interview and compete for it? And could get valuable experience and connections? So no, she doesn’t give it up because the company reorganized their internships. That’s not her fault. And it doesn’t make her less worth of the experience.
But, she should word it so it’s not deceptive on the application. First of all, because that’s the honest thing to do and character matters. And secondly because, sure, admissions are allegedly race blind now. But the emphasis is on allegedly. If the college reads the application, believes she is a URM, and then she does something like interview and it’s apparent she’s not Black, it could call her character into question.
So be honest in the listing: “completed Women in Business Internship at Goggle (please note this program was merged with the Black Women in STEM Internship at Google for summer 2024 and may appear under that name).
Done.
And congrats to your kid. I hope it’s a great opportunity.
Anonymous wrote:Of course she shouldn’t give up a prestigious internship because its administration is being merged with a program for URM. It’s still basically the same opportunity ands she still had to interview and compete for it? And could get valuable experience and connections? So no, she doesn’t give it up because the company reorganized their internships. That’s not her fault. And it doesn’t make her less worth of the experience.
But, she should word it so it’s not deceptive on the application. First of all, because that’s the honest thing to do and character matters. And secondly because, sure, admissions are allegedly race blind now. But the emphasis is on allegedly. If the college reads the application, believes she is a URM, and then she does something like interview and it’s apparent she’s not Black, it could call her character into question.
So be honest in the listing: “completed Women in Business Internship at Goggle (please note this program was merged with the Black Women in STEM Internship at Google for summer 2024 and may appear under that name).
Done.
And congrats to your kid. I hope it’s a great opportunity.
Anonymous wrote:I'd list it on activities section as the program she applied for and was accepted into. Seems cleaner and more honest.