Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids already have investment accounts, but the reason was more what I had to endure rather than what future might bring.
I worked high stress minimum wage job for ca 18 years. To get out of it, I learned to invest.
OP, at least you seemed to have had nice time working and getting to your freedom from work hasn't been a priority. I still have nightmares from that job.
It puts the damper on my financial freedom.
Me no speaky English is one of the reason I ended up being underpaid and mistreated for so long.
Really? I think I'm mistreated because I'm a 40+ mother in a male dominated field where all the men have SAHWs. The mentality is the I should be home with my kids my household doesn't deserve my income.
But look at it from other side. At my level I make 300k and nearly all the men had SAHW. The 30 percent of women my level with kids also make 300k but had husbands making at least 300k so they had 600k to 700k income. Every time they ran out the door to pick up kids or on maternity leave the men would pick up the slack.
Of course we had to listen to their stores of their visits to France, Martha’s Vineyard and skinning in Aspen something none of us could afford.
My unpaid wife attended school events, made dinner, cleaned up, put kids to bed by herself cause I was working late covering for a women making 300k with a 400k husband. That did not go well.
They need to pay SAHWs
Anonymous wrote:If you wait until your late 30s or early 40s to have kids, then yes, all of that is quite difficult to do simultaneously. If you have them earlier, it’s much easier.
Anonymous wrote:
My husband started feeling the effects of ageism when he turned 50. My best friend as well. Two different fields.
Andecdotal data, of course, but it seems to me 50 is the cut-off beyond which you are not guaranteed to find a well-paying job in your field if you need a new one, and some people will actively start shuffling you out of your existing job.
Anonymous wrote:I just got a great job at 47. WFH, so I’m still accessible to my teens all day. Plenty of time for working out and sleep. I feel really grateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think total financial independence by 40 is unrealistic especially if you have dependent children.
However I do think advising your kids to set up their lives so that they or their partner can work part time or not work (or both partners work flexible jobs) by 40 that is good advice -- it is really hard to have a dual income couple with regular 9-5 jobs plus kids and feel sane. Relying on dual income at that stage is just really tough on people and I think my generation (I'm an Xennial) got sold a bill of goods about pursuing careers and having kids that was just not realistic.
But that does't mean being financially independent by 40. We are mid 40s and very much still working but DH is working towards retirement at 52 and I work 30 hours a week in a consulting job that I will happily do in some capacity well into my 50s for even 60s (flexible WFH and I like my job and it's realistic for me to be able to reduce my hours or take time off because I can pick and choose projects). At 38 we were both still working regular full time jobs and with kids it became untenable and we made choices to fix that so that we could enjoy our life and also actually enjoy seeing our kids grow up and also not tie ourselves to jobs until we're 65.
If your DH is retiring at 52 and you were part time for a decade, you certainly had financial means to be independent in your 40s.
What did your DH do for career?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids already have investment accounts, but the reason was more what I had to endure rather than what future might bring.
I worked high stress minimum wage job for ca 18 years. To get out of it, I learned to invest.
OP, at least you seemed to have had nice time working and getting to your freedom from work hasn't been a priority. I still have nightmares from that job.
It puts the damper on my financial freedom.
Me no speaky English is one of the reason I ended up being underpaid and mistreated for so long.
Really? I think I'm mistreated because I'm a 40+ mother in a male dominated field where all the men have SAHWs. The mentality is the I should be home with my kids my household doesn't deserve my income.
But look at it from other side. At my level I make 300k and nearly all the men had SAHW. The 30 percent of women my level with kids also make 300k but had husbands making at least 300k so they had 600k to 700k income. Every time they ran out the door to pick up kids or on maternity leave the men would pick up the slack.
Of course we had to listen to their stores of their visits to France, Martha’s Vineyard and skinning in Aspen something none of us could afford.
My unpaid wife attended school events, made dinner, cleaned up, put kids to bed by herself cause I was working late covering for a women making 300k with a 400k husband. That did not go well.
They need to pay SAHWs
Anonymous wrote:I just got a great job at 47. WFH, so I’m still accessible to my teens all day. Plenty of time for working out and sleep. I feel really grateful.