Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Summer swim (and swimming in general) definitely isn't for everyone. You kind of have to drink the Kool Aid, and have the bandwidth for all the volunteering, in order to enjoy it. We love it but completely understand why others don't. But I really wish we didn't have the A meet/B meet thing here. Where I grew up, all of the meets were scored. IM was a regular event for age 11-12 and up, and each age group had a free relay. I'm pretty sure each kid could swim 2 individual events + 1 relay. Each team could enter 3 relays per age group, so everyone got in the lineup somehow even if it was just on a C free relay. It allowed everyone to feel like they were potentially contributing to scoring points for the team. There was so much more cheering and spirit because every team member felt valued. Wednesday night meets were electric... sometimes literally with lightning! If a storm ended the meet early and the score was close, we would go back and finish the meet the next night. Summer swim here feels way less inclusive. The DC area has a knack for making things less fun.
I think my kid prefers swimming fly and free in a B meet to swimming one leg of a C relay in an A meet. Is being that kid and watching other kids have two swims plus a relay really better than just going to a B meet where they're an equal part of the team
Younger kids didn't really pay much attention to who was swimming in more events unless their parents were talking to them about it. They were too busy playing and eating junk food from concessions. It's more obvious to young kids when they just aren't invited to certain meets. Older kids who only swam in the summer/weren't super committed to swimming had a blast being part of relays. Those are the most fun part of summer swim anyway.
Dual meets were all about the team. Individual glory was for divisionals/all stars and winter swim. If you have a good team culture and parents who don't get too caught up in their own kids' individual success, the swimmers are happy to contribute however they are needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people whose kids play other sports have a hard time with swimming because it's a cut and dry sport. There's no question about which kid is better...there's a clock. Baseball, soccer, lacrosse, etc. aren't like this. In swimming it's your kid against the clock, that's it. Super competitive parents don't like this environment because they can't pretend their kid is the best anymore.
I wish this was true, but we still have parents at our club insistent that their kid needs to move up when other kids the same age move up despite their kid being far slower than the ones advancing. I never understand what those parents are thinking when they do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people whose kids play other sports have a hard time with swimming because it's a cut and dry sport. There's no question about which kid is better...there's a clock. Baseball, soccer, lacrosse, etc. aren't like this. In swimming it's your kid against the clock, that's it. Super competitive parents don't like this environment because they can't pretend their kid is the best anymore.
I wish this was true, but we still have parents at our club insistent that their kid needs to move up when other kids the same age move up despite their kid being far slower than the ones advancing. I never understand what those parents are thinking when they do that.
What do you mean by move up? Into a different practice group or lane? Or move up the ladder? If practices are held by age, there shouldn't be any moving up for parents to argue about. If parents are bothering coaches about their kids moving into a different lane, the president or whoever should send a message making it clear that decisions about how practices are run are strictly determined by the coaches. If you give parents an inch of room, some will take it way too far in terms of giving input on things they know nothing about. The president and/or board should really act as a buffer, as it can be hard for coaches who are teens/college age kids to push back on adults who are older than them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people whose kids play other sports have a hard time with swimming because it's a cut and dry sport. There's no question about which kid is better...there's a clock. Baseball, soccer, lacrosse, etc. aren't like this. In swimming it's your kid against the clock, that's it. Super competitive parents don't like this environment because they can't pretend their kid is the best anymore.
I wish this was true, but we still have parents at our club insistent that their kid needs to move up when other kids the same age move up despite their kid being far slower than the ones advancing. I never understand what those parents are thinking when they do that.
Anonymous wrote:I think people whose kids play other sports have a hard time with swimming because it's a cut and dry sport. There's no question about which kid is better...there's a clock. Baseball, soccer, lacrosse, etc. aren't like this. In swimming it's your kid against the clock, that's it. Super competitive parents don't like this environment because they can't pretend their kid is the best anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Summer swim (and swimming in general) definitely isn't for everyone. You kind of have to drink the Kool Aid, and have the bandwidth for all the volunteering, in order to enjoy it. We love it but completely understand why others don't. But I really wish we didn't have the A meet/B meet thing here. Where I grew up, all of the meets were scored. IM was a regular event for age 11-12 and up, and each age group had a free relay. I'm pretty sure each kid could swim 2 individual events + 1 relay. Each team could enter 3 relays per age group, so everyone got in the lineup somehow even if it was just on a C free relay. It allowed everyone to feel like they were potentially contributing to scoring points for the team. There was so much more cheering and spirit because every team member felt valued. Wednesday night meets were electric... sometimes literally with lightning! If a storm ended the meet early and the score was close, we would go back and finish the meet the next night. Summer swim here feels way less inclusive. The DC area has a knack for making things less fun.
I think my kid prefers swimming fly and free in a B meet to swimming one leg of a C relay in an A meet. Is being that kid and watching other kids have two swims plus a relay really better than just going to a B meet where they're an equal part of the team
Anonymous wrote:Summer swim (and swimming in general) definitely isn't for everyone. You kind of have to drink the Kool Aid, and have the bandwidth for all the volunteering, in order to enjoy it. We love it but completely understand why others don't. But I really wish we didn't have the A meet/B meet thing here. Where I grew up, all of the meets were scored. IM was a regular event for age 11-12 and up, and each age group had a free relay. I'm pretty sure each kid could swim 2 individual events + 1 relay. Each team could enter 3 relays per age group, so everyone got in the lineup somehow even if it was just on a C free relay. It allowed everyone to feel like they were potentially contributing to scoring points for the team. There was so much more cheering and spirit because every team member felt valued. Wednesday night meets were electric... sometimes literally with lightning! If a storm ended the meet early and the score was close, we would go back and finish the meet the next night. Summer swim here feels way less inclusive. The DC area has a knack for making things less fun.