Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also strikes again usually means something negative, FYI.

It is a negative if you are on the left wing crazy train, which many on this forum are.

There's no such thing, really, as a left wing "crazy train."

It's the right wing that are batshit crazy. They hate America and its values. We saw that clearly on Jan. 6. Just the other day crazy Republicans in Washington state came out against democracy: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/the-wa-gop-put-it-in-writing-that-theyre-not-into-democracy/

I'll give Glenn Youngkin credit for trying to appear to be the voice of moderation for Republicans, what with the cute sweater vest and everything. He's your more typical robber baron Republican. But his policymaking has been a joke, from his stupid pandering about schools that people saw right through down to his mismanagement of our budgets and his poor decision making about our economy. Virginians saw through it right away and regretted voting for him, which is why Democrats control the legislature now.

None of this analysis is "crazy." It's actually pretty conventional and mainstream thinking.

Your relentless need to cheerlead your party's leaders, however... That's some crazy ass shit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also strikes again usually means something negative, FYI.

It is a negative if you are on the left wing crazy train, which many on this forum are.

Anonymous wrote:Also strikes again usually means something negative, FYI.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, Virginia's market isn't large enough to matter. If California phases out gas engines, automakers will have to figure out EV because their market is big enough to matter

That will not happen. Either feds will preempt or a lawsuit will stop Cali. Electric cars as a real thing are 20-30 years away. They will be here but not anytime soon.

Actually EVs in their current form are near or at their zenith. By 2040 current gas stations will have half their pumps dispensing gas and the other half hydrogen, by 2050 it will be 75/25 hydrogen/gas and by 2060 all hydrogen. That my friends is the future.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, Virginia's market isn't large enough to matter. If California phases out gas engines, automakers will have to figure out EV because their market is big enough to matter

That will not happen. Either feds will preempt or a lawsuit will stop Cali. Electric cars as a real thing are 20-30 years away. They will be here but not anytime soon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, Virginia's market isn't large enough to matter. If California phases out gas engines, automakers will have to figure out EV because their market is big enough to matter

That will not happen. Either feds will preempt or a lawsuit will stop Cali. Electric cars as a real thing are 20-30 years away. They will be here but not anytime soon.

Anonymous wrote:Meh, Virginia's market isn't large enough to matter. If California phases out gas engines, automakers will have to figure out EV because their market is big enough to matter

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a terrible governor Youngkin is. Thankfully his political career is over after he fumbled the midterms and he'll be out of office in 18 months.

Guy is a pandering dweeb with no actual policy convictions. It's embarrassing.

You are just a Maryland LWNJ who is jealous of our awesome governor Youngkin.

Anonymous wrote:What a terrible governor Youngkin is. Thankfully his political career is over after he fumbled the midterms and he'll be out of office in 18 months.

Guy is a pandering dweeb with no actual policy convictions. It's embarrassing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

Anonymous wrote:He got it right on another front too.

WTH is our Pentagon doing buying Chinese-made solar panels for the roof???????
Has Secretary Austin ever heard about the Trojan Horse?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Anonymous wrote:What a terrible governor Youngkin is. Thankfully his political career is over after he fumbled the midterms and he'll be out of office in 18 months.

Guy is a pandering dweeb with no actual policy convictions. It's embarrassing.