Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

Not sure why Cochran is solely blamed when Oj had an entire starting line of attorneys. It’s not his fault the detective admitted to Nazi memorabilia in his home. planting drugs on black men ,and saying the n word in the past .

Cochran didn’t orchestrate the defense. The LAPD whistleblowers ratted Furhman out with old tapes. OJ got lucky by way of LAPD incompetence

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

I’ve always been conflicted about this as so many of us are I’m sure, but to be honest, that’s what defense attorneys do, not just to “win” but to ensure the prosecution is honest. They are there to not just defend but expose the flaws of the prosecution. And they did that here.

PP here. I understand your points but strongly disagree with the use of trickery and the exclusion of evidence that's significant to the case. Nicole's and Ron's murders were horrifically brutal, and OJ walked.

Yup. Get all of that. Believe me I shed not one tear when OJ died. I met Denise in ‘95 when I was working at a DV shelter. I appreciate what she was starting to do at that time. But the State has to be above board, and they weren’t in spectacular fashion here. It sucks big time. Corruption won.

+1 PP here. Thank you for sharing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

I’ve always been conflicted about this as so many of us are I’m sure, but to be honest, that’s what defense attorneys do, not just to “win” but to ensure the prosecution is honest. They are there to not just defend but expose the flaws of the prosecution. And they did that here.

PP here. I understand your points but strongly disagree with the use of trickery and the exclusion of evidence that's significant to the case. Nicole's and Ron's murders were horrifically brutal, and OJ walked.

Yup. Get all of that. Believe me I shed not one tear when OJ died. I met Denise in ‘95 when I was working at a DV shelter. I appreciate what she was starting to do at that time. But the State has to be above board, and they weren’t in spectacular fashion here. It sucks big time. Corruption won.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

I’ve always been conflicted about this as so many of us are I’m sure, but to be honest, that’s what defense attorneys do, not just to “win” but to ensure the prosecution is honest. They are there to not just defend but expose the flaws of the prosecution. And they did that here.

PP here. I understand your points but strongly disagree with the use of trickery and the exclusion of evidence that's significant to the case. Nicole's and Ron's murders were horrifically brutal, and OJ walked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

I’ve always been conflicted about this as so many of us are I’m sure, but to be honest, that’s what defense attorneys do, not just to “win” but to ensure the prosecution is honest. They are there to not just defend but expose the flaws of the prosecution. And they did that here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

We get the type of attorney he was. He didn't have concern for the victims. Just do whatever trickery it took to get OJ off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

+1 “if it don’t fit, you must acquit”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Johnny Cochrane was a defense lawyer working to defend OJ. He was supposed to use every trick in the book to get OJ off. The fact that he did get OJ off the hook means that he did a good job.

Dominique, the middle one on the couch…wtf did she do to her nose and lip?! Omg!!!

Anonymous wrote:I saw them recently on GMA and was shocked at her appearance. She reminds me of that cat lady.

You’re not narrowing it down very much.

Anonymous wrote:Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Both were a part of it, but Johnny Cochran used every trick in the book to get OJ off.
Disgusting legacy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s enjoyable but what on earth did Dominique do to herself? What has been her story these past 30 years? The sisters were so pretty during the trial. Shame they possibly didn’t feel the same way.

All of the sisters have gone through issues with alcohol addiction and mental health issues. Dominique's son recently died young. Denise's son was arrested for domestic battery not long ago.

He may have been arrested for domestic battery, but was he convicted of anything?

OJ wasn’t convicted. Does that mean anything to you? They have money so of course convictions wont happen esp for first offense. Money talks .

These women look like parenting was last on their to do lists. Botox and partying were far more important

Regardless of OJ not being convicted, it doesn't mean that every man that is arrested for domestic battery is guilty. Sometimes false charges are made, and sometimes both parties are guilty of the same alleged offense.

This is hypocritical. You sound like the OJ defenders.

DV is DV. Frankly, the Brown family aren’t the best at parenting . Not for nothing but none of Nicole’s sisters fought to get custody of her kids. They can’t handle parenting. The kids were given to OJ.

Why are people blaming Cochran and ignoring the fact that one of the main reasons Cochran was successful was because of that racist POS Fuhrman.

Anonymous wrote:These women have advocated for stronger domestic abuse laws, including the Violence Against Women Act and anti-stalking laws.

But sure let's talk about their faces aging and plastic surgery

Pathetic.

+10000

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s enjoyable but what on earth did Dominique do to herself? What has been her story these past 30 years? The sisters were so pretty during the trial. Shame they possibly didn’t feel the same way.

All of the sisters have gone through issues with alcohol addiction and mental health issues. Dominique's son recently died young. Denise's son was arrested for domestic battery not long ago.

He may have been arrested for domestic battery, but was he convicted of anything?

OJ wasn’t convicted. Does that mean anything to you? They have money so of course convictions wont happen esp for first offense. Money talks .

These women look like parenting was last on their to do lists. Botox and partying were far more important

Regardless of OJ not being convicted, it doesn't mean that every man that is arrested for domestic battery is guilty. Sometimes false charges are made, and sometimes both parties are guilty of the same alleged offense.