Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are requiring you to go to these lunch events? Then that is your lunch break.
I think if you are going to this lunch break and then taking a second lunch break, then don't.
Nooo a mandatory company event is not a break. Lunch break is unpaid. If they are requiring attendance, it should be paid.
Op here. This is my take as well. I work 8-5pm with a 1 hour UNPAID lunch break.
I think it's petty to request attendance and then ask us to take the time we spend at the Company "event" out of our unpaid lunch break.
We are admin./support staff and all agree on this. I thought I'd come here to hear what other companies or what's legal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are requiring you to go to these lunch events? Then that is your lunch break.
I think if you are going to this lunch break and then taking a second lunch break, then don't.
Nooo a mandatory company event is not a break. Lunch break is unpaid. If they are requiring attendance, it should be paid.
I agree with this, but I also think OP is going to be branded as high maintenance/a whiner if she pushes back on this. Which sucks. But if her lunch hour is being monitored enough for anyone to notice this, then she is likely not high up enough to be making waves.
And maybe in the employer’s eyes it is an optional free lunch so it seems like she’s double dipping.
Anonymous wrote:This is so cheap of you and antisocial. Either take the free lunch and eat with your coworkers or go out on your own dime. I've never had a free lunch in 20 years of working, but I do enjoy eating with my colleagues occasionally.
Frankly, if you hate your coworkers that much that you can't even eat a free lunch with them, you need to get a new job.
You're lucky you get a paid lunch. I do not. I get 2 15 minute breaks, but I have to work 8.5 hours so that I can take a 30 min lunch. I'm only paid 8 hours.
Anonymous wrote:As a supervisor your attitude would really gnaw at me. Enjoy the free lunch and mixing with your coworkers then get back to work.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a reason you're being so nitpicky?
Anonymous wrote:Your supervisor must find you really rigid. Goodness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are requiring you to go to these lunch events? Then that is your lunch break.
I think if you are going to this lunch break and then taking a second lunch break, then don't.
Nooo a mandatory company event is not a break. Lunch break is unpaid. If they are requiring attendance, it should be paid.
Anonymous wrote:As a supervisor your attitude would really gnaw at me. Enjoy the free lunch and mixing with your coworkers then get back to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are not talking like a team player. It's a free lunch, which you say you partake in and a chance to network with coworkers.
But here you are quibbling over getting "cheated" out of an hour's pay a few times a year in exchange for the above.
You are not valuing team-building company events.
"Team Player" = when I am getting paid. If its my lunch break I am not getting paid and there is no team and I am not playing.
Company events should be paid if mandatory. Implicitly or explicitly mandatory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are not talking like a team player. It's a free lunch, which you say you partake in and a chance to network with coworkers.
But here you are quibbling over getting "cheated" out of an hour's pay a few times a year in exchange for the above.
You are not valuing team-building company events.
"Team Player" = when I am getting paid. If its my lunch break I am not getting paid and there is no team and I am not playing.
Company events should be paid if mandatory. Implicitly or explicitly mandatory.
Is this OP again? Do you clock in and clock out, like a fast food worker, for example who rightly has pay protections for overtime and shift differentials? Are you a nonexempt employee who is either on the clock or not?
If not, lose this mentality. Your boss is watching.
I am not OP but OP states they have a contract from 8-5 with a 1-hour break. There are some companies that work like this and will pay for overtime over 40 hours. My company is one such company because as another poster has so eloquently pointed out most companies expect a minimum of 40 but only pay a maximum of 40. If I have to use PTO to take an hour doctors appointment but I am still working 40+ hours the whole idea of exempt employee is a sham.
The claim is that you will get bonuses and promotions as an exempt employee to make up for extra hours worked. From my experience is the bosses buddies he goes for drinks with that get the bonuses not the long hours get things done workers, but maybe your workplace is the exception
Anonymous wrote:A few times per year our company gets lunch from our vendors.
I normally eat and mingle a bit with other co-workers I barely see, then I go out for my lunch break. (1hr.)
I was just told by my supervisor, that I needed to use this time as my lunch break. My Contract says 8-5 with 1hr. break.
I honestly would rather take my break than attend these lunch breaks. There is no policy in the company and people do different things from eating at their desk during lunch to going out during lunch.
Is he reasonable to ask for this? I do not have work pending at my desk and it is not interfering with my work.
What Companies/employees normally do?