Anonymous wrote:The next Communication and Stakeholder Engagement Committee meeting is on Monday September 16. Probably during a time most people can not attend. Or is this going to be like the one in May among a few students and stakeholders such as a Board member trying to win her seat in Nov (Shebra Evans)? If this meeting is an open discussion, what are some topics that need addressing at this meeting?: better communication during emergencies, Safety in schools, open bathrooms so students and staff don't shit in their pants, more MC classes offered on HS campuses so students don't have to travel to a MC campus, later school start times?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:some topics included later school times, narcan-opiod

It has been a decade since the last review of school start times. Did the student panelists ask BOE to review school times now? :
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/855/1181788.page#27554887

Anonymous wrote:some topics included later school times, narcan-opiod

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt like some of the students concerns were a little too much like how one kid said his advisory period was to loud. How will the board fix that? Ask your teacher.

I also found Ms.Evans comments very passive aggressive. You are going to tell the student to go talk about their concerns with someone else when you are the one that invited them there? Make it make sense.

I agree with previous posters about the representation of this group. DS would have loved to testify but we never knew about it. The same familiar faces that are presidents or secretaries of -insert random advocacy club- that has 10 members and meets once a year.

I agree 100 percent. I think they should only focus on High school. Most of the problems are in the high schools.

+1

Hard disagree. There are many of the high schools problems present at the middle school level and if interrupt those harmful behaviors when they're in middle school, you have a better chance of them not showing up in high school at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt like some of the students concerns were a little too much like how one kid said his advisory period was to loud. How will the board fix that? Ask your teacher.

I also found Ms.Evans comments very passive aggressive. You are going to tell the student to go talk about their concerns with someone else when you are the one that invited them there? Make it make sense.

I agree with previous posters about the representation of this group. DS would have loved to testify but we never knew about it. The same familiar faces that are presidents or secretaries of -insert random advocacy club- that has 10 members and meets once a year.

I agree 100 percent. I think they should only focus on High school. Most of the problems are in the high schools.

Anonymous wrote:I felt like some of the students concerns were a little too much like how one kid said his advisory period was to loud. How will the board fix that? Ask your teacher.

I also found Ms.Evans comments very passive aggressive. You are going to tell the student to go talk about their concerns with someone else when you are the one that invited them there? Make it make sense.

I agree with previous posters about the representation of this group. DS would have loved to testify but we never knew about it. The same familiar faces that are presidents or secretaries of -insert random advocacy club- that has 10 members and meets once a year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I felt like some of the students concerns were a little too much like how one kid said his advisory period was to loud. How will the board fix that? Ask your teacher.

I also found Ms.Evans comments very passive aggressive. You are going to tell the student to go talk about their concerns with someone else when you are the one that invited them there? Make it make sense.

I agree with previous posters about the representation of this group. DS would have loved to testify but we never knew about it. The same familiar faces that are presidents or secretaries of -insert random advocacy club- that has 10 members and meets once a year.

The inner circle and insular nature of MCPS is a serious problem.

Anonymous wrote:I felt like some of the students concerns were a little too much like how one kid said his advisory period was to loud. How will the board fix that? Ask your teacher.

I also found Ms.Evans comments very passive aggressive. You are going to tell the student to go talk about their concerns with someone else when you are the one that invited them there? Make it make sense.

I agree with previous posters about the representation of this group. DS would have loved to testify but we never knew about it. The same familiar faces that are presidents or secretaries of -insert random advocacy club- that has 10 members and meets once a year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Commend the students!

But it's so much more fun to complain about every single thing MCPS/the BOE ever does!

It's that way with idiots. Lots to complain about when they are such fools.

Central Office has entered the group chat.

How clever you think you are.

Not as clever as you all who twist your brain into pretzels to excuse the incompetence and failures of MCPS and can't stand an iota of criticism and feedback if it isn't flattering or full of fluff and lies. Grow a spine.

Everyone knows there are many problems to be solved. There are also good things happening. Have some perspective.

If your house is on fire and someone points it out, do you whine and complain that they didn't notice how pretty your lawn is? Get a sense of urgency and prioritization. You sound ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:Did you hear about Eastern MS? Geez. Fix it now, MCPS! MoCo Council - investigate the horrible conditions!