Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Thank you very much. In the omnibus corrupt Supreme Court thread I said this is what your side would try as an excuse.
Really? Defending free speech now is an excuse?
Anyways, here is link to the hatch act.
Please read it. Alito did nothing wrong.
https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx
So you're suggesting that they needed to add a bullet to cover federal employees supporting an insurrection? I'm not sure they had that much foresight that this was needed when pulling this legislation together.
Both he and his wife are allowed free speech. They did this on their own property. His wife is allowed to be her own person - he does not own her and she is not bound to the SCOTUS ethics.
Believe it or not, woman can have their own opinions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Thank you very much. In the omnibus corrupt Supreme Court thread I said this is what your side would try as an excuse.
Really? Defending free speech now is an excuse?
Anyways, here is link to the hatch act.
Please read it. Alito did nothing wrong.
https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx
So you're suggesting that they needed to add a bullet to cover federal employees supporting an insurrection? I'm not sure they had that much foresight that this was needed when pulling this legislation together.
Both he and his wife are allowed free speech. They did this on their own property. His wife is allowed to be her own person - he does not own her and she is not bound to the SCOTUS ethics.
Believe it or not, woman can have their own opinions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Thank you very much. In the omnibus corrupt Supreme Court thread I said this is what your side would try as an excuse.
Really? Defending free speech now is an excuse?
Anyways, here is link to the hatch act.
Please read it. Alito did nothing wrong.
https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx
So you're suggesting that they needed to add a bullet to cover federal employees supporting an insurrection? I'm not sure they had that much foresight that this was needed when pulling this legislation together.
Both he and his wife are allowed free speech. They did this on their own property. His wife is allowed to be her own person - he does not own her and she is not bound to the SCOTUS ethics.
Believe it or not, woman can have their own opinions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Thank you very much. In the omnibus corrupt Supreme Court thread I said this is what your side would try as an excuse.
Really? Defending free speech now is an excuse?
Anyways, here is link to the hatch act.
Please read it. Alito did nothing wrong.
https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx
So you're suggesting that they needed to add a bullet to cover federal employees supporting an insurrection? I'm not sure they had that much foresight that this was needed when pulling this legislation together.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Just like Menendez. I guess blaming the wife is the one thing the right and left can agree on.
Why is it so hard to believe the wife turned the flag upside down?
Anonymous wrote:"I had no involvement whatsoever in the flying of the flag," Alito told the Times in an emailed statement. "It was briefly placed by Mrs. Alito in response to a neighbor’s use of objectionable and personally insulting language on yard signs."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-justice-alitos-home-flew-us-flag-upside-down-following-jan-6-nyt/ar-BB1mwSIQ?ocid=BingNewsSerp
His wife probably hung it that way accidentally. Why is this even a story in 2024??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Where are you posting from that you have this little knowledge about the volume of rules, ethics, and professional behavior that federal employees have to follow?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Just like Menendez. I guess blaming the wife is the one thing the right and left can agree on.
Why is it so hard to believe the wife turned the flag upside down?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Just like Menendez. I guess blaming the wife is the one thing the right and left can agree on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Just like Menendez. I guess blaming the wife is the one thing the right and left can agree on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Just like Menendez. I guess blaming the wife is the one thing the right and left can agree on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Must be why he blamed it on his wife.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has a right to free speech because, get this, Supreme Court justices are US citizens.
It’s his private property.
Where are you posting from that you have this little knowledge about the volume of rules, ethics, and professional behavior that federal employees have to follow?
+1
It really is astonishing that this got so little attention.
Apparently you both do not understand the Hatch act. It’s not surprising since most don’t.