Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If they aren’t also saying the NOI is racist, wants racial separatism , is antisemitic and homophobic then this is very problematic and no different than overlooking that founding fathers owned slaves etc
Mentioning that the founders fathers owned slaves is a detail but is not why they are the founding fathers or the reason that they are important. Racial superiority and wanting racial separatism are fundamental to the NOI.
One of the reasons why we had the horrors of slavery in this country is that the founding fathers founded in on the basis of inequality. Understanding that is central to understanding American history.
If you assume that the APUSH curriculum offers multiple perspectives, why aren’t you making the same assumptions about the teachers in this course? If you aren’t making that assumption shouldn’t you be throwing a tantrum about APUSH instead since it impacts many more students?