Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am leaving my kids as much as possible. As climate change makes conditions worse, those with more money will be able to handle it a lot better.
This approach always floors me. You could use some of that money to improve the problem (through research , political donations, NGOs), which would help everyone. Or you can squirrel away money so just your family is immunized against the perils threatening the rest of society.
Are you a Republican?
You think my money is going to solve the problem when all do the countries in the world cannot? Ha. I will do what I can, which is put my kids in as best a condition that I can. Giving $5m or $50m isn’t going to do squat.
Anonymous wrote:Why would someone earn all that money if not to leave it to kids? seriously
Anonymous wrote:We are in the process of updating our estate documents and it has become very tense. Current investments are around $14M and our only debt is $400K mortgage and we will owe income taxes when we exercise our stock options (probably around $1.2M or so in taxes). Bottom line, we aren't going to run out of money based on our current spending so there will be a substantial amount left when we die.
My husband only wants to leave each of our 2 kids $2M each and the rest to charity. My concern is $2M seems like a lot of money, but when you consider inflation, who knows what it will be in 20 or 30 years. He keeps telling me he doesn't want his legacy to be making his kids wealthy. I am struggling with leaving them such a small percentage of our estate. Both my husband and I came from very humble background, and he basically wants our kids to have our same or similar struggles in life. I am at a loss at how to counter this.
Anyone else grapple with this?
Anonymous wrote:My kid was diagnosed recently with a chronic disease. Ask him how he’d feel if he didn’t leave money to a child in that situation. I will try to leave my kids every penny I can because you never know what can happen.
Anonymous wrote:2M is plenty. I think there is nothing wrong with his suggestion.
Anonymous wrote:[twitter]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If youve given your kids every opportunity, paid for college, help with downpayment, yearly assistance to help with tax burden.....what more do you want to give them?
A sizable inheritance, so they can have financial security and because you can’t take it with you.
If 2M plus all that isnt sizeable enough you have a warped sense of the definition.
I don’t think anyone is arguing that 2M isn’t significant. The point is that it’s a fraction of the parents overall wealth, and many parents would choose to leave their kids and grandkids as much as they had.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If youve given your kids every opportunity, paid for college, help with downpayment, yearly assistance to help with tax burden.....what more do you want to give them?
A sizable inheritance, so they can have financial security and because you can’t take it with you.
If 2M plus all that isnt sizeable enough you have a warped sense of the definition.
Anonymous wrote:We are in the process of updating our estate documents and it has become very tense. Current investments are around $14M and our only debt is $400K mortgage and we will owe income taxes when we exercise our stock options (probably around $1.2M or so in taxes). Bottom line, we aren't going to run out of money based on our current spending so there will be a substantial amount left when we die.
My husband only wants to leave each of our 2 kids $2M each and the rest to charity. My concern is $2M seems like a lot of money, but when you consider inflation, who knows what it will be in 20 or 30 years. He keeps telling me he doesn't want his legacy to be making his kids wealthy. I am struggling with leaving them such a small percentage of our estate. Both my husband and I came from very humble background, and he basically wants our kids to have our same or similar struggles in life. I am at a loss at how to counter this.
Anyone else grapple with this?
Anonymous wrote:If youve given your kids every opportunity, paid for college, help with downpayment, yearly assistance to help with tax burden.....what more do you want to give them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am leaving my kids as much as possible. As climate change makes conditions worse, those with more money will be able to handle it a lot better.
This approach always floors me. You could use some of that money to improve the problem (through research , political donations, NGOs), which would help everyone. Or you can squirrel away money so just your family is immunized against the perils threatening the rest of society.
Are you a Republican?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If youve given your kids every opportunity, paid for college, help with downpayment, yearly assistance to help with tax burden.....what more do you want to give them?
A sizable inheritance, so they can have financial security and because you can’t take it with you.