Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why shouldn't Indian food be expensive?
Again, vegetarian based ingredients. It’s understandable why a seafood restaurant would be expensive due to the cost and short shelf life of fish. My go to Indian order is usually a samosa (pastry, peas, potato and spices) garlic naan (flour, oil and spices) and a palak paneer (spinach, paneer, oil/butter and spices). It has nothing to do with the food being Indian. I usually end up spending close to what I would spend on sushi at an Indian restaurant and to me based on ingredients it never made sense and portions are usually on the smaller side.
Anonymous wrote:At Indigo some breads go up to $8 a piece and meals start at $19. https://www.indigowdc.com/
At Rasika which is more upscale entrees start at $20 and naan starts at $5. https://www.rasikarestaurant.com/penn-quarter-menu
Anonymous wrote:Why shouldn't Indian food be expensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it requires a ton of ingredients and prep. It requires sooooooo much more work than say Italian food. I bet you have no problems paying $25 for a pasta dish, yet you sneer at $22 for an Indian dish that requires 2x the work.
NP, but while reading this thread I was thinking about what a ripoff vegetarian pasta dishes are. The markup is insane. I can understand that Indian restaurants are spending more money on spices alone than other restaurants.
You are forgetting about technique ,skill and quality of ingredients . Indian food works really well in take out and buffets because it can sit. Italian and French food , to be good require precise technique and timing. Because the dishes don’t have 20 ingredients slow cooked for hours, each needs to be prepared very well. Italian and French food can be really awful if not prepared well and get ruined if not served at the right time. There are more Italian and French restaurants than Indian restaurants but far more really good Italian and French restaurants than Indian restaurants.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it requires a ton of ingredients and prep. It requires sooooooo much more work than say Italian food. I bet you have no problems paying $25 for a pasta dish, yet you sneer at $22 for an Indian dish that requires 2x the work.
Are you an Indian restaurant owner LOL? Most places keep all the master mixes frozen in bulk and throw dishes together quickly.
No, I just recognize the ethnocentric bias in cuisine costs. People expect stuff like Indian, Thai, Chinese, etc. to be cheap and delicious while they have no problems paying 2x more for something like Italian food or French food that is half the labor and 1/4 the number of ingredients. Ha, as if Italian places don’t have premade sauces often times they simply heat up and throw in the boxed pasta they boiled.
The expectations for ethnic cuisines are twice as high compared to such mediocre Italian food, yet consumers demand cheap costs. It’s ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it requires a ton of ingredients and prep. It requires sooooooo much more work than say Italian food. I bet you have no problems paying $25 for a pasta dish, yet you sneer at $22 for an Indian dish that requires 2x the work.
NP, but while reading this thread I was thinking about what a ripoff vegetarian pasta dishes are. The markup is insane. I can understand that Indian restaurants are spending more money on spices alone than other restaurants.
Anonymous wrote:Why shouldn't Indian food be expensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it requires a ton of ingredients and prep. It requires sooooooo much more work than say Italian food. I bet you have no problems paying $25 for a pasta dish, yet you sneer at $22 for an Indian dish that requires 2x the work.
Are you an Indian restaurant owner LOL? Most places keep all the master mixes frozen in bulk and throw dishes together quickly.
No, I just recognize the ethnocentric bias in cuisine costs. People expect stuff like Indian, Thai, Chinese, etc. to be cheap and delicious while they have no problems paying 2x more for something like Italian food or French food that is half the labor and 1/4 the number of ingredients. Ha, as if Italian places don’t have premade sauces often times they simply heat up and throw in the boxed pasta they boiled.
The expectations for ethnic cuisines are twice as high compared to such mediocre Italian food, yet consumers demand cheap costs. It’s ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Because it requires a ton of ingredients and prep. It requires sooooooo much more work than say Italian food. I bet you have no problems paying $25 for a pasta dish, yet you sneer at $22 for an Indian dish that requires 2x the work.