Anonymous wrote:Read question 28 on the last page. https://www.simscampbell.law/wp-content/uploads/Revocable_Trusts_Maryland.pdf
It won’t let me paste it for some reason. The bank has no legal obligation to notify you until the trust becomes irrevocable in MD. So something happened. It’s worth requesting the full trust from the bank. I would start there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you have the actual trust document? If so, have you read it? It may answer many of your questions. As her successor trustee, I administered my aunt’s trust ($300,000) when she became unwell and I used it to pay her expenses while she was alive and the trust had explicit instructions for how to distribute assets when she died. I don’t see why you need a lawyer unless you can’t understand what the document says.
So, what does it say? There is a reason the bank sent it to you, and I don’t know what that reason is. They have no obligation to notify beneficiaries until the assets are going to be transferred. Then there is a requirement in most states to notify beneficiaries within 60 days that they are a names party to a trust.
Step 1: read the documents
Actually this is in Maryland and the bank told me according to Maryland law, the beneficiaries do now legally have to get annual statements of the trust. I do not have the actual trust document though. Just a bank statement of the various investments. I will ask the bank if they can send me the actual trust document then. I’m not sure if it will be permitted if in his name but I can try.
Debby is admitted in Maryland too. She’s very knowledgeable. Worth a consult.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would call him and say thank you and just check on him to see if he is ok or needs anything. Hopefully he didn’t do this because he is sick or something. Not sure what other people think
Based on the description here, I don't think the trust is from the uncle. It sounds like maybe the grandparents or some other relative set it up with the uncle as a beneficiary and then named the original poster and sibling as remainder beneficiaries (probably as heirs of their parent who is the uncle's sibling). If he's not otherwise close to uncle it may not be a good idea to talk to him about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t read all the posts.
I’m a lawyer - not trusts and estates - but I come from a family with lots of trusts and I’m the de facto family coordinator of everything.
Did your uncle move to a different state recently? Some states require remainder beneficiaries to be kept abreast of trust accountings. That may be what this is.
As for your questions, you would need the trust document to answer most of those. You may or may not have the right to access the trust document.
But basically here is the deal. The most likely scenario is that at some point someone older than your uncle set up a trust and made your uncle the primary beneficiary. You are the remainderman, since he is childless the trust was probably written so nieces or nephews are the back up remaindermen if he doesn’t have any kids. It could also just be divided any descendants of the original grantor so it could be not just you guys but also cousins or ai ya and uncles. It is also very possible that your uncle has the right to write a will and leave it to the grantors descendants or
Will post more later
Sorry, I had to leave and do something else. Saw your update.
I wonder if your uncle moved to a different state lately? Some states require accounting to remainder men, some do not.
Or maybe he changed financial institutions and the new bank thinks they need to send you a reporting whereas the old bank did not?
Or maybe he actually set this trust up for himself recently?
Anyway. In terms of what you should do - nothing. In terms of what you should count on - nothing.
It's entirely possible he has the ability to change the remainder men. It's also possible he has the right to leave you next to nothing and leave the rest to charity.
I would assume that you inherit (nothing) though it's entirely possible you will inherit a ton.
I would NOT do anything to antagonize the situation. Technically as a remainder man, you could try to insist he follows the terms of the trust to a T (ie that he doesn't spend too much on himself). But pushing him about this could backfire because he could write a will leave the trust to someone else.
I don't have kids and my dad's lawyer put all sort of provisions in there to make sure my nieces and nephews wouldn't be able to pester me about this trust. I am the primary beneficiary.I have the right to leave it to them or to charity or to both. If one is a dick, I can leave it to the rest of them and exclude the one who is a dick.
Hard to know, since you haven't seen the trust.
But bottom line - don't antagonize your uncle. Be nice.
You might want to ask an attorney if you should ask for a copy of the trust, or you may want to ask your uncle who is lawyer is who is holding the documents for when he dies. But be wary of any lawyer who proposes any shenanigans designed to keep the money preserved for you. That could backfire, big time.
Bottom line, consider any inheritance a pleasant but not expected gift.
Anonymous wrote:I haven’t read all the posts.
I’m a lawyer - not trusts and estates - but I come from a family with lots of trusts and I’m the de facto family coordinator of everything.
Did your uncle move to a different state recently? Some states require remainder beneficiaries to be kept abreast of trust accountings. That may be what this is.
As for your questions, you would need the trust document to answer most of those. You may or may not have the right to access the trust document.
But basically here is the deal. The most likely scenario is that at some point someone older than your uncle set up a trust and made your uncle the primary beneficiary. You are the remainderman, since he is childless the trust was probably written so nieces or nephews are the back up remaindermen if he doesn’t have any kids. It could also just be divided any descendants of the original grantor so it could be not just you guys but also cousins or ai ya and uncles. It is also very possible that your uncle has the right to write a will and leave it to the grantors descendants or
Will post more later
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some trusts contain a "bomb." A bomb goes off under the right conditions per the trust contents and you get automatically removed as a beneficiary. Trusts aren't cut and dry - better to get a lawyer to look it over.
Which is why all of us are advising her to get the documents first. There is no “bomb” gonna go off by writing a letter to the bank asking for a copy of the trust which they are legally obligated to provide. This is all the lawyer will do at this point anyway. My only hypothesis is that all of you are lawyers and trying to get a buck out of her pocket.
Not a lawyer but if I was, I woudn't be hitting DCUM for leads.
If it was a $100k trust, I'd say no need to ask a lawyer, but this is $15mln. For serious money, spending $500 for some legal advice seems like a good idea.
And you know what the first thing the lawyer will say - get a copy of the trust documents. So no, OP doesn’t need a lawyer at this point since she doesn’t even have the trust documents.