The shack is actually where the owner kept his prisoners.

Anonymous wrote:

You can still see the original shack on the bottom!

That's ridiculous. Were they required to keep it intact because of historical preservation codes?

Planning a murder? This might be the place for you. Cleanup will be easy.

Ugly. No privacy on those windows.

We lived in an Arabian Gulf State and it reminds of bad (not good) architecture that you might find there. It wouldn't look out of place at all with palms around it. I haven't looked deeply at the photos, but it seems to have nice light. To me, it presents dark from the outside, better from the inside.

The red bathrooms and accents deeply creep me out. I just couldn't. But I do love the overall architecture generally.

It just feels South Asian to me.

It looked better as a shack.

Objectively the house is quite awful, odd proportion and weird color choices.

That being said, I do love it. Looks modern/futuristic. I surprisingly like the red bathroom and red accents. Would I pay $2m for this? Hell no (unless I had a ton of money, which I do not). But I do like it

Of course they are middle eastern…..

It looks like a spaceship.

That made my head hurt.

You can still see the original shack on the bottom!

Anonymous wrote:What is up with the description? "Originally a humble shack owned by a prominent TV journalist..."

The current building was built on top of the original house. You can still see the original house on the bottom of the current house.

Anonymous wrote:What is up with the description? "Originally a humble shack owned by a prominent TV journalist..."

+1 All that makes me want is to know what it looked like before and who owned it.