This sounds like another way to make women into an old sexist trope and stereotype. People judge people for all sorts of reasons. Many more than just two.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Ok you're opinion on the matter is the only one that is valid here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
Hmm. There is that smugness OP's mom referenced. I just think those larger rings suggest the wearer thinks gems are pretty and that they enjoy sparkling jewelry.
PP. There are lots of pretty sparkles that cost less than $10-20K. Which is the price point of the real rings in that category. I figured somebody would call me out for my comments but I'm pretty sure this size of ring, like driving a luxury car, is intended to be noticed/assessed by others. The people I know like this, the bride tells the groom what to buy. These are not spontaneously presented rings.
My ring was about 11k. The diamond isn't huge at all, but it isn't small either -- it has a 1.5 carat center stone. It isn't "intended to be noticed/assessed by others" at all. I like rocks, I always have, my grandfather was a geologist and my first science fair project in early elementary school was about geodes. Diamonds are beautiful to look at, as are rubies, sapphires, amethysts, opals, whatever. Your post? Well -- there is that judgment with smugness OP is asking about...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
I know unmarried women in certain industries who buy those rings before they travel to conferences etc. in order to avoid being bothered.
An engagement or wedding ring is NOT a deterrent on business travel. They actually attract more men because they are looking for casual sex with others already in a relationship.
Yeah. Travel for work and sit at the bar in a hotel restaurant trying to eat a quiet dinner and gross men desperate for casual fun will come out of the woodwork -- wedding ring or not.
Go into the restaurant and eat there. People are not likely to visit you from another table to talk. But a bar is where a lot of lonely people strike up conversations, it's not a place for a "quiet dinner".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
I think aunt is likely making comments about ops ring perhaps behind her back and regularly has opinions on engagement rings and mom was shutting her sister down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Mom was saying don't worry about what other people think. They are dumb and petty.
Aunt asked a question. Mom interrupted and told daughter what to think before letting her reply on her own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Mom was saying don't worry about what other people think. They are dumb and petty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Was her mom implying aunt was jealous or smug? It doesn't make sense that she was either so mom was just talking a bunch of nonsense. Aunt isn't jealous of OPs ring and she wasn't smug b/c she knows OP can afford better, if she wanted.
Anonymous wrote:I think your mom was sticking up for you and putting your aunt in her place.
I don't think she was trying to communicate a universal truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judging engagement ring size is very petty on the sliding scale of female pettiness.
When someone has a small stone, I assume they married young or had other priorities.
The larger rings used to be more indicative of something about the finances of the couple, but the advent of lab-grown diamonds makes it impossible to know. So now I just think those larger rings suggest a need to show off. But don't actually convey anything financial about the owner.
My local CVS has some decent-looking large diamond engagement ring knockoffs (odd that they sell them there...isn't it?).
I know unmarried women in certain industries who buy those rings before they travel to conferences etc. in order to avoid being bothered.
An engagement or wedding ring is NOT a deterrent on business travel. They actually attract more men because they are looking for casual sex with others already in a relationship.
Yeah. Travel for work and sit at the bar in a hotel restaurant trying to eat a quiet dinner and gross men desperate for casual fun will come out of the woodwork -- wedding ring or not.