Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My memories of Yale are totally defined by the shabby, dark and irregular quality of the housing. They've renovated a lot but it's still not great, especially because everyone pays the same amount but the luck of the housing lottery or willingness to submit fake doctor notes can make the difference between a stunning suite or a dumpy rathole.

Although residential colleges and dorm rooms were supposedly selected mostly randomly and only to balance things by geography, gender and interests, that was not the case. Inevitably the most well-off or connected students ended up in the most spacious, historically special or appealing 1st year suites. I understand that Harvard did things quite similarly. Not sure if others are more evolved.

What kind of doctors note gets you a nicer dorm?

The one with 10 $100 bills paper clipped to it when you hand deliver it to the housing person.

Anonymous wrote:Saw Brown, Penn, Harvard and Georgetown (not Ivy, I know). Dorms ranged from just about OK to pretty bad. Long overdue for renovation at a minimum.

Penn doesn’t show you dorms on the public tours. Only way you could see is if you knew a student at the dorm. Did you know anyone and what dorm did you see?

Lauder dorms are very nice and Guttman dorms are very nice as well.

Guttman will be available to Freshman this upcoming year because 50% of the Quad will be renovated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a weird topic.

You don't go to college to live in luxury dorms. Having lived in genuinely crappy apartments in my 20s, none of the dorms I ever saw at Ivy schools (attended two for undergrad and grad) were terrible. They could be basic. But it's part of the fun and being in college.

+1.
The only thing you want in a dorm is location. Nobody wanted the farflung ones that had you trudging from eastbuttfurk

+2 The rooms are clean (until the students get into them) and functional. I guess there's a newer generation that may be used to more luxury, but even my rich Ivy classmates didn't complain about the dorm rooms. It's just part of being away from home.

Anonymous wrote:
My memories of Yale are totally defined by the shabby, dark and irregular quality of the housing. They've renovated a lot but it's still not great, especially because everyone pays the same amount but the luck of the housing lottery or willingness to submit fake doctor notes can make the difference between a stunning suite or a dumpy rathole.

Although residential colleges and dorm rooms were supposedly selected mostly randomly and only to balance things by geography, gender and interests, that was not the case. Inevitably the most well-off or connected students ended up in the most spacious, historically special or appealing 1st year suites. I understand that Harvard did things quite similarly. Not sure if others are more evolved.

What kind of doctors note gets you a nicer dorm?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn has two nice freshman dorms(Hill, Lauder) plus the older freshman quad dorms are halfway done with renovations and those will be nice soon. The upperclass dorms are a mix but not bad.

Ivies are old campuses. Dorms are never going to be the same glitz as the big southern schools. No one picks ivies for dorms. You pick it for the unparalleled education and outcomes and the state of the art research spaces.

Lauder is an upperclassmen dorm being used to house freshmen while the Quad is being renovated. It have a freshman this year. It is suites and they are lovely. However, I wish she had the normal freshmen experience of doubles along a long hall with doors open all of the time. I also don’t think college kids need to live in dorms that are nicer than their house at home.

Lauder seems to have an antisocial rep. Any basis for that?

Not sure. As I mentioned about my kid- I wish she had a more typical freshman dorm experience. The rooms are all suites, so maybe that’s what it seems antisocial….suites are definitely less social than typical college doubles.

Yale is all suites, they were very social.

Suites can be terrible if you end up in the wrong entryway or with a bad roommate combination. Some floors had 3-5 suites and a great mix of social people that made it the place to be. In other suites, you could be one of just 2 suites on your floor and if the mix was wrong, you'd rarely see a soul- that was my freshman year. I think a long hallway of rooms might be unpleasant in terms of living conditions but a very positive social environment!

My best living experience was when I was in a tiny, crowded entryway with the 4 smallest suites in my residential college. It was the housing lottery dumping ground and had basically the worst picks from each class. It was really great to mix across 3 classes and our cramped conditions somehow encouraged more mixing than if we'd had more square footage.

Suites are best if they don't include bathrooms. Harvard used to have most bathrooms within suites, while Yale had most bathrooms in hallways outside of suites. I think ensuite bathrooms are convenient but are not great for socializing because people have no reason to see anyone but their immediate roommate and can turn really antisocial.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've heard that Dartmouth is building new undergraduate housing, but yeah, they're mostly awful. Renovations sound great but on a compact campus they often mean that you'll spend multiple years in old nasty housing being woken up at 6:00 am by noisy construction in the dorms adjacent to yours...which will be open the year after you graduate.

My memories of Yale are totally defined by the shabby, dark and irregular quality of the housing. They've renovated a lot but it's still not great, especially because everyone pays the same amount but the luck of the housing lottery or willingness to submit fake doctor notes can make the difference between a stunning suite or a dumpy rathole.

Although residential colleges and dorm rooms were supposedly selected mostly randomly and only to balance things by geography, gender and interests, that was not the case. Inevitably the most well-off or connected students ended up in the most spacious, historically special or appealing 1st year suites. I understand that Harvard did things quite similarly. Not sure if others are more evolved.

Weird, I thought the rooms I lived in at Yale were pretty nice. Wood paneling, hardwood floors and a fireplace! And they have been renovated since my time, with two brand new residential colleges.

I'm pretty sure every freshman suite had wood floor and most had a random (non-working) fireplace, but mine was definitely not nice. You lucked out! And my residential college was an absolute dump and one of the last to be renovated. It's nicer now, but still cramped and pokey compared to dorms at other schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn has two nice freshman dorms(Hill, Lauder) plus the older freshman quad dorms are halfway done with renovations and those will be nice soon. The upperclass dorms are a mix but not bad.

Ivies are old campuses. Dorms are never going to be the same glitz as the big southern schools. No one picks ivies for dorms. You pick it for the unparalleled education and outcomes and the state of the art research spaces.

Lauder is an upperclassmen dorm being used to house freshmen while the Quad is being renovated. It have a freshman this year. It is suites and they are lovely. However, I wish she had the normal freshmen experience of doubles along a long hall with doors open all of the time. I also don’t think college kids need to live in dorms that are nicer than their house at home.

Lauder seems to have an antisocial rep. Any basis for that?

Not sure. As I mentioned about my kid- I wish she had a more typical freshman dorm experience. The rooms are all suites, so maybe that’s what it seems antisocial….suites are definitely less social than typical college doubles.

Yale is all suites, they were very social.

Anonymous wrote:I've heard that Dartmouth is building new undergraduate housing, but yeah, they're mostly awful. Renovations sound great but on a compact campus they often mean that you'll spend multiple years in old nasty housing being woken up at 6:00 am by noisy construction in the dorms adjacent to yours...which will be open the year after you graduate.

My memories of Yale are totally defined by the shabby, dark and irregular quality of the housing. They've renovated a lot but it's still not great, especially because everyone pays the same amount but the luck of the housing lottery or willingness to submit fake doctor notes can make the difference between a stunning suite or a dumpy rathole.

Although residential colleges and dorm rooms were supposedly selected mostly randomly and only to balance things by geography, gender and interests, that was not the case. Inevitably the most well-off or connected students ended up in the most spacious, historically special or appealing 1st year suites. I understand that Harvard did things quite similarly. Not sure if others are more evolved.

Weird, I thought the rooms I lived in at Yale were pretty nice. Wood paneling, hardwood floors and a fireplace! And they have been renovated since my time, with two brand new residential colleges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn has two nice freshman dorms(Hill, Lauder) plus the older freshman quad dorms are halfway done with renovations and those will be nice soon. The upperclass dorms are a mix but not bad.

Ivies are old campuses. Dorms are never going to be the same glitz as the big southern schools. No one picks ivies for dorms. You pick it for the unparalleled education and outcomes and the state of the art research spaces.

Lauder is an upperclassmen dorm being used to house freshmen while the Quad is being renovated. It have a freshman this year. It is suites and they are lovely. However, I wish she had the normal freshmen experience of doubles along a long hall with doors open all of the time. I also don’t think college kids need to live in dorms that are nicer than their house at home.

Lauder seems to have an antisocial rep. Any basis for that?

They had a parent weekend party for families and they do movie nights and took a “field trip” off campus to somewhere fun . The Hill kids seemed to mention lauder had more outings though seems dorms all have outings

Weird post. I can’t believe how much space you get at Harvard by junior l/senior year. Do t know where renovations stand these days but I’d take a place in that location in Cambridge any day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn has two nice freshman dorms(Hill, Lauder) plus the older freshman quad dorms are halfway done with renovations and those will be nice soon. The upperclass dorms are a mix but not bad.

Ivies are old campuses. Dorms are never going to be the same glitz as the big southern schools. No one picks ivies for dorms. You pick it for the unparalleled education and outcomes and the state of the art research spaces.

Lauder is an upperclassmen dorm being used to house freshmen while the Quad is being renovated. It have a freshman this year. It is suites and they are lovely. However, I wish she had the normal freshmen experience of doubles along a long hall with doors open all of the time. I also don’t think college kids need to live in dorms that are nicer than their house at home.

Lauder seems to have an antisocial rep. Any basis for that?

Not sure. As I mentioned about my kid- I wish she had a more typical freshman dorm experience. The rooms are all suites, so maybe that’s what it seems antisocial….suites are definitely less social than typical college doubles.

Interesting take, I had the exact opposite thought on suites. They seem much more fun and social to me because of the common rooms. My DD is in the school where most of the housing is suites and people really like it because medium sized gatherings so easy to host. Nobody wants the rooms that are just standalone bedrooms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Penn has two nice freshman dorms(Hill, Lauder) plus the older freshman quad dorms are halfway done with renovations and those will be nice soon. The upperclass dorms are a mix but not bad.

Ivies are old campuses. Dorms are never going to be the same glitz as the big southern schools. No one picks ivies for dorms. You pick it for the unparalleled education and outcomes and the state of the art research spaces.

Lauder is an upperclassmen dorm being used to house freshmen while the Quad is being renovated. It have a freshman this year. It is suites and they are lovely. However, I wish she had the normal freshmen experience of doubles along a long hall with doors open all of the time. I also don’t think college kids need to live in dorms that are nicer than their house at home.

Lauder seems to have an antisocial rep. Any basis for that?

Not sure. As I mentioned about my kid- I wish she had a more typical freshman dorm experience. The rooms are all suites, so maybe that’s what it seems antisocial….suites are definitely less social than typical college doubles.

Anonymous wrote:The ones we have seen ( three different schools) look awful. Are any Ivy dorms in good shape??

I don't think people attend ivies for the dorms??

Maybe a state school instead??

When I hear people asking about schools with really nice dorms I think of some mid-tier state school where they have tiered levels of dorms and allow some students to pay more than other students for newer, nicer dorms.

That's not how the Ivies roll.

Princeton has a mix of newer and older dorms. I would prefer a newer one but YMMV.