Anonymous wrote:Anyone know how hard it is to get onto an Arlington boys team at the U9 level? Is it like ADP where they take almost everyone that tries out?
Anonymous wrote:We were at girls tryouts, at the 630 time slot for the second session, and my daughter played on the third field the whole time. She didn't get an offer. I was surprised to hear that there were a good number of girls in the earlier time slot (2016s, not 2017s) who did get offers. Any thoughts on this? Would the league answer a follow-up inquiry? Just curious as to where they saw her/had her slotted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were at girls tryouts, at the 630 time slot for the second session, and my daughter played on the third field the whole time. She didn't get an offer. I was surprised to hear that there were a good number of girls in the earlier time slot (2016s, not 2017s) who did get offers. Any thoughts on this? Would the league answer a follow-up inquiry? Just curious as to where they saw her/had her slotted.
Those girls were probably in the new futures program at Arlington. The more cynical DCUM’ers among us would decry this as pay-to-play $$ grab, but at the same time, the futures coaches (who were at the tryouts) know those kids well, for better or worse, and it may not be any more a naked money grab than all the ADP kids who eventually make travel.🤷 It can’t hurt to follow up with them, I’m curious to see if they mention futures as a reason.
I would ask them what happened. Seems like an odd turnout, as the later time slots were the more competitive girls.
I disagree that the second time slot was overall more competitive. But that’s just my two cents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We were at girls tryouts, at the 630 time slot for the second session, and my daughter played on the third field the whole time. She didn't get an offer. I was surprised to hear that there were a good number of girls in the earlier time slot (2016s, not 2017s) who did get offers. Any thoughts on this? Would the league answer a follow-up inquiry? Just curious as to where they saw her/had her slotted.
Those girls were probably in the new futures program at Arlington. The more cynical DCUM’ers among us would decry this as pay-to-play $$ grab, but at the same time, the futures coaches (who were at the tryouts) know those kids well, for better or worse, and it may not be any more a naked money grab than all the ADP kids who eventually make travel.🤷 It can’t hurt to follow up with them, I’m curious to see if they mention futures as a reason.
I would ask them what happened. Seems like an odd turnout, as the later time slots were the more competitive girls.
Anonymous wrote:We were at girls tryouts, at the 630 time slot for the second session, and my daughter played on the third field the whole time. She didn't get an offer. I was surprised to hear that there were a good number of girls in the earlier time slot (2016s, not 2017s) who did get offers. Any thoughts on this? Would the league answer a follow-up inquiry? Just curious as to where they saw her/had her slotted.
Anonymous wrote:All these clubs do this. It’s weird. Why not just A, B, C ? Makes more sense.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the team names mean? Are the 2016 teams ranked like the older teams that use colors? Confused by the premier league names of the teams instead of the usual Red, White, Blue.