Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep.
Whatever will the 4/4.6 1390 poor test-taking children of DCUM do?
ED to Tulane.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/04/11/harvard-reinstates-sat-act-admissions-requirement/
Harvard is joining the list of school requiring test scores for applications.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
How? A kid can still take SAT/ACT in the summer or early fall. And in reality, if your kid had interest in Harvard or any other T20 school, they should have been planning to attempt the SAT in junior year. Very few kids today just say, oh I'm not trying the SAT/ACT and will just apply to T20 schools. Most are at least taking the test, with some test prep. Then they evaluate and decide whether to submit
actually, lots of CA kids skip them entirely
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
How? A kid can still take SAT/ACT in the summer or early fall. And in reality, if your kid had interest in Harvard or any other T20 school, they should have been planning to attempt the SAT in junior year. Very few kids today just say, oh I'm not trying the SAT/ACT and will just apply to T20 schools. Most are at least taking the test, with some test prep. Then they evaluate and decide whether to submit
Makes me wonder if part of the underlying motivation to go back to requiring scores is just to make the process of reviewing applications easier and less costly? Because if you're right and the superstar Ivy-bound kids are mostly already testing, then in practice the impact of going test-required just means fewer applications to sift through. Mostly, at least?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:test optional was a failed experiment
it wasn't an experiment it was due to testing centers closing during the pandemic
CA schools didn't go TO because of covid.
Am genuinely curious how the UC's are going to respond to the changes. UCLA had almost 145k applicants this year! Cal Berkeley had 125k applicants. Those numbers are... wild.
The UCs were moving to TO before covid. Covid just accelerated the process. It won't change anything. They have more than enough highly qualified applicants to choose from.
Anonymous wrote:yep.
Whatever will the 4/4.6 1390 poor test-taking children of DCUM do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:test optional was a failed experiment
it wasn't an experiment it was due to testing centers closing during the pandemic
some experiments arise out of necessity
I think test optional doesn't make sense for the most selective and most popular institutions. But for others I think it still makes sense to let students present themselves with the information they feel most reflects their strengths. I think it should go back to how it was pre-Covid--with some institutions being test optional and with going test optional being a relative rarity rather the decision to go optional becoming a sort of overall game theory type decision for all students.
Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:test optional was a failed experiment
it wasn't an experiment it was due to testing centers closing during the pandemic
CA schools didn't go TO because of covid.
Am genuinely curious how the UC's are going to respond to the changes. UCLA had almost 145k applicants this year! Cal Berkeley had 125k applicants. Those numbers are... wild.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:test optional was a failed experiment
it wasn't an experiment it was due to testing centers closing during the pandemic
CA schools didn't go TO because of covid.
Am genuinely curious how the UC's are going to respond to the changes. UCLA had almost 145k applicants this year! Cal Berkeley had 125k applicants. Those numbers are... wild.
UC schools went Test Blind completely independent of Covid. I am fine with Test Blind or Test Required, but TO has been the absolute worst.
Supposedly, they are creating their own test...not sure if that is still happening or what. I don't see them ever returning to SAT/ACT.
Don't get me wrong, I am not a fan of the College Board and have some thoughts about a private company having the kind of power they have over educational outcomes in America without much oversight at all.
But also, I am not super optimistic about California's ability to develop a test that substitutes for the SAT and ACT without reintroducing the same issues that made them go test blind in the first place.
Should be interesting!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
How? A kid can still take SAT/ACT in the summer or early fall. And in reality, if your kid had interest in Harvard or any other T20 school, they should have been planning to attempt the SAT in junior year. Very few kids today just say, oh I'm not trying the SAT/ACT and will just apply to T20 schools. Most are at least taking the test, with some test prep. Then they evaluate and decide whether to submit
actually, lots of CA kids skip them entirely
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
How? A kid can still take SAT/ACT in the summer or early fall. And in reality, if your kid had interest in Harvard or any other T20 school, they should have been planning to attempt the SAT in junior year. Very few kids today just say, oh I'm not trying the SAT/ACT and will just apply to T20 schools. Most are at least taking the test, with some test prep. Then they evaluate and decide whether to submit
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class
How? A kid can still take SAT/ACT in the summer or early fall. And in reality, if your kid had interest in Harvard or any other T20 school, they should have been planning to attempt the SAT in junior year. Very few kids today just say, oh I'm not trying the SAT/ACT and will just apply to T20 schools. Most are at least taking the test, with some test prep. Then they evaluate and decide whether to submit
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:test optional was a failed experiment
it wasn't an experiment it was due to testing centers closing during the pandemic
CA schools didn't go TO because of covid.
Am genuinely curious how the UC's are going to respond to the changes. UCLA had almost 145k applicants this year! Cal Berkeley had 125k applicants. Those numbers are... wild.
UC schools went Test Blind completely independent of Covid. I am fine with Test Blind or Test Required, but TO has been the absolute worst.
Supposedly, they are creating their own test...not sure if that is still happening or what. I don't see them ever returning to SAT/ACT.
Anonymous wrote:this is for current Juniors? my kid has no interest in Harvard, but this seems really really late to make this call for this class