Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was pretty accurate. But I liked CollegeVine more… it had chancing information for smaller schools that had no scattergram in Naviance.
But how would they know for the smaller schools when so much is about essays and special ways the kid meets their institution priorities?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Was pretty accurate. But I liked CollegeVine more… it had chancing information for smaller schools that had no scattergram in Naviance.
But how would they know for the smaller schools when so much is about essays and special ways the kid meets their institution priorities?
why did you apply to those? Genuinely asking if you thought she fit is a unique way or just trying anyway?Anonymous wrote:We only had 2023 data, but ours was 100% accurate. My kid only got rejected from the schools where her stats were in a sea of red x's.
Anonymous wrote:Was pretty accurate. But I liked CollegeVine more… it had chancing information for smaller schools that had no scattergram in Naviance.
Anonymous wrote:Nope. My kid was well above and to the right of his ED1 pick (Villanova) plus his application was strong in a lot of other ways, but was rejected. The only kids accepted there (public HS) this year were legacy.
He aimed much lower ED2 and got in.
The only other schools he heard from were likelies and got into all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ours was pretty spot on in that is showed what colleges really liked kids from DS's high school (jesuit schools) and what schools were not worth even considering -- for example UT-Austin hates his high school (statistically speaking).
What was very hard to guess was DS's gpa - which was fine at the end of JR year but significantly higher at graduation (because all AP courses senior year)
Interesting. So seems it is worth spending time figuring out which colleges your high school does well at. Our school can’t seem to get a kid into UGA for example but sends 5-7 kids a year to Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:Ours was pretty spot on in that is showed what colleges really liked kids from DS's high school (jesuit schools) and what schools were not worth even considering -- for example UT-Austin hates his high school (statistically speaking).
What was very hard to guess was DS's gpa - which was fine at the end of JR year but significantly higher at graduation (because all AP courses senior year)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about those that did not include test scores? GPA high but test score just ok.
My DD applied test optional. Naviance not very helpful for this scenario, College Vine much more so, will advise whether to apply with or without scores for a given school. Naviance recently added a check box for the scattergram to see only test optional results, but it wasn't pulling up any results from our school even at the large popular public universities. Needs more time to get enough data I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about those that did not include test scores? GPA high but test score just ok.
My DD applied test optional. Naviance not very helpful for this scenario, College Vine much more so, will advise whether to apply with or without scores for a given school. Naviance recently added a check box for the scattergram to see only test optional results, but it wasn't pulling up any results from our school even at the large popular public universities. Needs more time to get enough data I guess.