Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if corporations could reduce the compensation of CEOs and shift that pay to the people who actually do the hard work, they wouldn’t have to raise prices.
This seems like the obvious solution to me. No one’s labor is worth 10s of millions a year. No one’s.
I agree but I’ll take that over what socialism would eventually do to this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If companies can't survive without exploiting workers at wages too low to live on then that tells me those companies didn't have good business models in the first place.
Excuse me. How are companies exploiting workers? Are the companies holding a gun to their heads forcing them to work for those wages? NO. They took those jobs on their own free will with the pay they were offered or negotiated. They are free to walk away anytime if they don’t like the pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If companies can't survive without exploiting workers at wages too low to live on then that tells me those companies didn't have good business models in the first place.
Excuse me. How are companies exploiting workers? Are the companies holding a gun to their heads forcing them to work for those wages? NO. They took those jobs on their own free will with the pay they were offered or negotiated. They are free to walk away anytime if they don’t like the pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor corporations can’t just treat people like they’re disposable? Boo hoo. Let the owners sling their own food if the jump from $16/$17 to $20 was too much.
You clearly have never run a business. They raised the employees’ wages and then raised their prices accordingly. Evidently, if your business, Panera Bread, is owned by a friend of the Governor then it’s ok to “treat people like they’re disposable”. Another shining example of Liberal hypocrisy.
Anonymous wrote:If companies can't survive without exploiting workers at wages too low to live on then that tells me those companies didn't have good business models in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor corporations can’t just treat people like they’re disposable? Boo hoo. Let the owners sling their own food if the jump from $16/$17 to $20 was too much.
You clearly have never run a business. They raised the employees’ wages and then raised their prices accordingly. Evidently, if your business, Panera Bread, is owned by a friend of the Governor then it’s ok to “treat people like they’re disposable”. Another shining example of Liberal hypocrisy.
Minimum wage want from $16 to $20. Did they really raise their prices that much? Overnight? Doubtful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if corporations could reduce the compensation of CEOs and shift that pay to the people who actually do the hard work, they wouldn’t have to raise prices.
This seems like the obvious solution to me. No one’s labor is worth 10s of millions a year. No one’s.
I agree but I’ll take that over what socialism would eventually do to this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if corporations could reduce the compensation of CEOs and shift that pay to the people who actually do the hard work, they wouldn’t have to raise prices.
This seems like the obvious solution to me. No one’s labor is worth 10s of millions a year. No one’s.
I agree but I’ll take that over what socialism would eventually do to this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fast food restaurants in California are raising prices and laying off workers since the $20 minimum wage for FF workers into effect on April 1st. What did they expect? That restaurants would pay this wage and graciously not raise prices? Those jobs were never meant to provide a living wage. Just causes more inflation and those workers are right back to where they were. Let’s see how many of those workers come off social safety net programs with the higher wages. I’m betting very few. Why don’t democrats understand how capitalism works?
You'll learn your Economic 101 lesson when you or your family member loses their job to AI in the next few years and realize the Republicans aren't there for you.
If everyone loses their job from AI who will pay all the taxes to support Democrats social programs. Better start learning some new skills.
Yeah, that's the problem, isn't it? There's going to be mass unemployment across the political spectrum, Democrats and Republicans.
I wonder who will survive in such an environment. My money is on Republicans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Poor corporations can’t just treat people like they’re disposable? Boo hoo. Let the owners sling their own food if the jump from $16/$17 to $20 was too much.
You clearly have never run a business. They raised the employees’ wages and then raised their prices accordingly. Evidently, if your business, Panera Bread, is owned by a friend of the Governor then it’s ok to “treat people like they’re disposable”. Another shining example of Liberal hypocrisy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if corporations could reduce the compensation of CEOs and shift that pay to the people who actually do the hard work, they wouldn’t have to raise prices.
This seems like the obvious solution to me. No one’s labor is worth 10s of millions a year. No one’s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If companies can't survive without exploiting workers at wages too low to live on then that tells me those companies didn't have good business models in the first place.
It tells me the workers needs to increase their skills so they can find jobs that pay more. Someone Flipping burgers was never meant to be paid a living wage.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe if corporations could reduce the compensation of CEOs and shift that pay to the people who actually do the hard work, they wouldn’t have to raise prices.
Anonymous wrote:If companies can't survive without exploiting workers at wages too low to live on then that tells me those companies didn't have good business models in the first place.