Anonymous wrote:All this talk about family being important rings hollow when you need to leave half your family at home in order to be welcome at the family event. No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rude
Wedding invites do not = command performance.
PP you are responding to. I agree with you in principle, and I probably wouldn't use the word "rude" if not for OP formulating the question that way. In this case:
1. The extended family is genuinely close.
2. OP hasn't formulated a specific plan or destination for this particular weekend; there is no prior commitment made, no bucket list item to check off, no deposits/tickets involved, etc.
3. There is nothing special about this particular weekend other than that it's 4 days long. There isn't an event/concert/birthday/seasonal highlight, etc. that requires this particular weekend.
4. The wedding/weekend is months away, so there is plenty of time to make an alternate plan.
5. OP's children are young, so there is plenty of time in the future for many family trips.
6. Because OP and her husband live far away from his family, the opportunities for him and their children to spend time with that whole side of the family, bond/build memories with them are not frequent and will become less so as time goes on.
So, it's not rude but just strikes me as an unfortunate choice.
Anonymous wrote:Kids only weddings don’t work for families with kids, especially if it’s out of town.
It’s OK to decline, just send a good gift depending on the relationship.
A few years ago we declined a kids only wedding. Since it was family (and family we like), we sent a $3000 wedding gift. Fast forward 4 years and 2 kids later, the bride and groom completely get it now.
We still jokingly give them a hard time about a kids only wedding, though. I think they get it. Lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your husband would rather go on the family trip, definitely do that. It’s not rude to decline to attend any wedding, but especially not one that excludes part of your family. (It's also not rude to have a no-kids wedding)
No it isn't. Nobody wants to pay for you to have your ill-mannered brats there.
This seems like an especially rude way to … agree with the person you’re responding to.
Anonymous wrote:Kids only weddings don’t work for families with kids, especially if it’s out of town.
It’s OK to decline, just send a good gift depending on the relationship.
A few years ago we declined a kids only wedding. Since it was family (and family we like), we sent a $3000 wedding gift. Fast forward 4 years and 2 kids later, the bride and groom completely get it now.
We still jokingly give them a hard time about a kids only wedding, though. I think they get it. Lol
Anonymous wrote:How old are your kids? And why do you think a four day weekend is a rare thing?
Anonymous wrote:If they slid no kids, it is fine to decline. You should not have find a stranger to watch them.?It’s rude to be be angry at people who won’t travel without kids or hire strangers to watch them.
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the wedding?
It’s not rude to decline if they say no kids.