Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unclear what is meant by “minimal.”
But it is absolutely true that people on here tend to view hours of homework per night as a proxy for school quality. When, in reality, activity often does not equal achievement.
It is a continuum. And will vary by student. But it is safe to say that Field/Burke are toward the lower end. Homework, yes, but not a soul crushing amount.
Personally, I am deeply skeptical of the idea that 3 hours per night every night is intrinsically a good thing.
Agreed. This varies with kid and chosen course selection, and our eyes, 3 hours of homework a night is not intrinsically a good thing.
Given that, and knowing our kid (who is a bit of a perfectionist) when we looked at HS this past fall (graduating out of a K-8), Burke, Field, SSFS, SAES, and Bullis were in the ballpark homework-wise.
This is the list I'd come up with too. But even at some of the other schools - you can limit homework dramatically by not being in the highest rigor courses. This usually can't be avoided for English/History - but choice of language (Latin) and taking the most basic math/science course will greatly reduce homework at a Big 3.
Why would Latin have less homework than other languages?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unclear what is meant by “minimal.”
But it is absolutely true that people on here tend to view hours of homework per night as a proxy for school quality. When, in reality, activity often does not equal achievement.
It is a continuum. And will vary by student. But it is safe to say that Field/Burke are toward the lower end. Homework, yes, but not a soul crushing amount.
Personally, I am deeply skeptical of the idea that 3 hours per night every night is intrinsically a good thing.
Agreed. This varies with kid and chosen course selection, and our eyes, 3 hours of homework a night is not intrinsically a good thing.
Given that, and knowing our kid (who is a bit of a perfectionist) when we looked at HS this past fall (graduating out of a K-8), Burke, Field, SSFS, SAES, and Bullis were in the ballpark homework-wise.
This is the list I'd come up with too. But even at some of the other schools - you can limit homework dramatically by not being in the highest rigor courses. This usually can't be avoided for English/History - but choice of language (Latin) and taking the most basic math/science course will greatly reduce homework at a Big 3.
Not AP Latin. It is hours of memorization. Both kids took it at Big 3.
Why would Latin have less homework than other languages?
Anonymous wrote:Generally speaking the independent private high schools consider themselves to be mostly college prep and as such consider themselves to have rigor and as such, no.
Obviously it varies from kid to kid and what classes they take, but you can't have a rigorous college prep program and simultaneously also have "minimal" homework.
Anonymous wrote:It really depends on class selection. For instance, a student taking all honors and APs at Bullis will have more homework that a student taking just the regular track classes at Sidwell. (Some of the regular track classes still will have a decent amount obviously), but rigor and homework is more a question of class selection than school much of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unclear what is meant by “minimal.”
But it is absolutely true that people on here tend to view hours of homework per night as a proxy for school quality. When, in reality, activity often does not equal achievement.
It is a continuum. And will vary by student. But it is safe to say that Field/Burke are toward the lower end. Homework, yes, but not a soul crushing amount.
Personally, I am deeply skeptical of the idea that 3 hours per night every night is intrinsically a good thing.
Agreed. This varies with kid and chosen course selection, and our eyes, 3 hours of homework a night is not intrinsically a good thing.
Given that, and knowing our kid (who is a bit of a perfectionist) when we looked at HS this past fall (graduating out of a K-8), Burke, Field, SSFS, SAES, and Bullis were in the ballpark homework-wise.
This is the list I'd come up with too. But even at some of the other schools - you can limit homework dramatically by not being in the highest rigor courses. This usually can't be avoided for English/History - but choice of language (Latin) and taking the most basic math/science course will greatly reduce homework at a Big 3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of them as far as I'm concerned. My kid barely does anything and has straight A's in MCPS.
Way to post in the appropriate forum.
Anonymous wrote:Don't want to start a homework debate but my child is burned out by the end of the school day.
Anonymous wrote:It really depends on class selection. For instance, a student taking all honors and APs at Bullis will have more homework that a student taking just the regular track classes at Sidwell. (Some of the regular track classes still will have a decent amount obviously), but rigor and homework is more a question of class selection than school much of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of them as far as I'm concerned. My kid barely does anything and has straight A's in MCPS.
Yes, and this is why grade inflation is so rampant in the public school system. A 4.0 student in FCPS, MCPS, LCPS, etc. do not compare to a 4.0 (heck, even a 3.75) student at a competitive private school.