Anonymous wrote:Probably needs to happen, but it will change nothing, as long as the moronic voters of DC keep electing people just like her.
The voters are the ones who should be recalled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm reading this exclusive interview from ABC 7 in DC and I'm furious.
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/dc-911-call-center-office-of-unified-communications-cleo-subido-whistleblower-lawsuit-mayor-muriel-bowser-dispatch-police-fire-ems-delayed-response-times-fraud-abuse-allegations
Between the 911 call center problems and the issues with the DC crime losing accreditation, I think its long overdue to recall Mayor Muriel Bowser.
Thoughts?
Yes, absolutely. Off the top of my head:
Education:
Underfunding
Test score scandal
Graduation scandal
Suspecting scandal
Public Safety:
Crime trends
911 call center
Crime lab
Housing:
Homeless shelter developer giveaway
Vouchers, everything about them, including paying above market rates
Not providing oversight of voucher recipients
Personnel:
Several scandals and resignations from her top staff
Land use:
Public field giveaways
Public building giveaways
Like I said, off the top of my head.
Every reason you listed is valid and is the reason I started this post. At the beginning I thought Bowser was at least competent. That she could keep the city running.
But that really isn't the case. This term is beginning to show that she does a horrible job of putting quality people in key positions.
People like the whistleblower show that there are people in this city willing to come in and try to do a good job. And that they actually care.
Watch the OP link on ABC. Bowser doesn't try to fix problems. She tries to bury it.
I hope someone has the motivation to begin a recall. I'd join it.
the main problem is, this is her third term and she doesn't have any competent cronies left to fill positions, so she is on the third/fourth tier now, and their lack of experience, lack of vision, lack of anything don't serve the mayor or city at all.
She was never a visionary. She came into the job as a protoge of Adrian Fenty, but her only real experience was as an ANC Commissioner and then Councilmember, but not even a seasoned one at that.
So, no vision and no administrative experience.
And we are seeing it now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People underestimate her popularity, probably because her most ardent critics are so terminally online (and so terminally white, and so terminally mediocre). There would be a massive backlash against any recall effort from the people in wards where 99 percent of DCUM posters never have stepped foot.
Nah. I think we’re pretty clear on her popularity. The Secure DC folks polled residents recently and we know what her approval rating is, and it’s in the mid-40’s. While that isn’t Eric Adams bad, it’s dropped substantially since when she was running for her third term and in general, it isn’t great, particularly when she doesn’t even have any rivals and the majority of District residents are Democratic.
Also, it seems like you are projecting a bit about the “people in wards where 99 percents of DCUM posters have never stepped foot.” Where, exactly, do you mean? Upper Northwest? Or somewhere else? Somewhere you find deplorable?
She would easily win reelection today, even if her popularity has dropped. Get out of your white bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People underestimate her popularity, probably because her most ardent critics are so terminally online (and so terminally white, and so terminally mediocre). There would be a massive backlash against any recall effort from the people in wards where 99 percent of DCUM posters never have stepped foot.
Nah. I think we’re pretty clear on her popularity. The Secure DC folks polled residents recently and we know what her approval rating is, and it’s in the mid-40’s. While that isn’t Eric Adams bad, it’s dropped substantially since when she was running for her third term and in general, it isn’t great, particularly when she doesn’t even have any rivals and the majority of District residents are Democratic.
Also, it seems like you are projecting a bit about the “people in wards where 99 percents of DCUM posters have never stepped foot.” Where, exactly, do you mean? Upper Northwest? Or somewhere else? Somewhere you find deplorable?
Anonymous wrote:People underestimate her popularity, probably because her most ardent critics are so terminally online (and so terminally white, and so terminally mediocre). There would be a massive backlash against any recall effort from the people in wards where 99 percent of DCUM posters never have stepped foot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was literally the most moderate Democrat in the last election. You’ll get a Justice Lab lackey if you recall Bowser
Who is a likely alternative, Robert White? If Pinto were to run there would be NO moderating voice on the Council.
Better to identify electable candidates for Council and Mayor and to focus on the current recalls. USAO is a huge issue as is AG. Who is an alternative for AG? McDuffie, who did not even meet the qualifications, ran anyway then had the requirements re: extent of legal practice changed?
Share you concerns re: 911, lab and all the rest but she was the best of a bad series of choices. Improving the alternatives is a needed step.
Absolutely and there are a few solid choices currently on the Council (Pinto and Henderson). If Pinto became mayor, Ward 2 would likely elect someone similarly moderate and business-friendly. And Pinto would definitely weigh in with an endorsement.
Henderson is more likely to win election as Mayor due to the demographics of the electorate, but she would most likely be replaced on the Council by someone who is more left leaning.
It seems like the best option right now is to support the open primary ballot initiative that will come up for a vote this fall. That's a great way to "improve the options" moving forward.
-W2 Democrat
What work or executive/administrative experience does Pinto have?
Come one people, use your heads.
Pinto just resonates with the DCUM demo. She'd have zero chance in a city wide
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was literally the most moderate Democrat in the last election. You’ll get a Justice Lab lackey if you recall Bowser
Who is a likely alternative, Robert White? If Pinto were to run there would be NO moderating voice on the Council.
Better to identify electable candidates for Council and Mayor and to focus on the current recalls. USAO is a huge issue as is AG. Who is an alternative for AG? McDuffie, who did not even meet the qualifications, ran anyway then had the requirements re: extent of legal practice changed?
Share you concerns re: 911, lab and all the rest but she was the best of a bad series of choices. Improving the alternatives is a needed step.
Absolutely and there are a few solid choices currently on the Council (Pinto and Henderson). If Pinto became mayor, Ward 2 would likely elect someone similarly moderate and business-friendly. And Pinto would definitely weigh in with an endorsement.
Henderson is more likely to win election as Mayor due to the demographics of the electorate, but she would most likely be replaced on the Council by someone who is more left leaning.
It seems like the best option right now is to support the open primary ballot initiative that will come up for a vote this fall. That's a great way to "improve the options" moving forward.
-W2 Democrat
What work or executive/administrative experience does Pinto have?
Come one people, use your heads.
Pinto just resonates with the DCUM demo. She'd have zero chance in a city wide
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was literally the most moderate Democrat in the last election. You’ll get a Justice Lab lackey if you recall Bowser
Who is a likely alternative, Robert White? If Pinto were to run there would be NO moderating voice on the Council.
Better to identify electable candidates for Council and Mayor and to focus on the current recalls. USAO is a huge issue as is AG. Who is an alternative for AG? McDuffie, who did not even meet the qualifications, ran anyway then had the requirements re: extent of legal practice changed?
Share you concerns re: 911, lab and all the rest but she was the best of a bad series of choices. Improving the alternatives is a needed step.
Absolutely and there are a few solid choices currently on the Council (Pinto and Henderson). If Pinto became mayor, Ward 2 would likely elect someone similarly moderate and business-friendly. And Pinto would definitely weigh in with an endorsement.
Henderson is more likely to win election as Mayor due to the demographics of the electorate, but she would most likely be replaced on the Council by someone who is more left leaning.
It seems like the best option right now is to support the open primary ballot initiative that will come up for a vote this fall. That's a great way to "improve the options" moving forward.
-W2 Democrat
What work or executive/administrative experience does Pinto have?
Come one people, use your heads.