Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?
No they don’t. Posters on these boards pulling ideas out of their a$$
It’s so annoying. This is a high stats kid who should be looking at top colleges and people are suggesting “less competitive” or “second rung” state schools and places like college of Charleston or Belmont. OP said nothing about looking for a less competitive school and why would she when her daughters stats are so high.
What are your suggestions for true targets and safeties? This was OP’s question. Not reaches. Thoughts?
St Olaf
Oberlin
Kenyon
Franklin & Marshall
Bard
Bryn Mawr
College of Wooster
Colleges that have a little prestige and are more selective than Belmont (96% accepted) or college of Charleston (76% accepted) or university of Minnesota (75% accepted) and Belmont avg SAT score is 1200. That should NOT be on OP’s list even if she likes the south.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?
No they don’t. Posters on these boards pulling ideas out of their a$$
It’s so annoying. This is a high stats kid who should be looking at top colleges and people are suggesting “less competitive” or “second rung” state schools and places like college of Charleston or Belmont. OP said nothing about looking for a less competitive school and why would she when her daughters stats are so high.
What are your suggestions for true targets and safeties? This was OP’s question. Not reaches. Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?
No they don’t. Posters on these boards pulling ideas out of their a$$
It’s so annoying. This is a high stats kid who should be looking at top colleges and people are suggesting “less competitive” or “second rung” state schools and places like college of Charleston or Belmont. OP said nothing about looking for a less competitive school and why would she when her daughters stats are so high.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?
No they don’t. Posters on these boards pulling ideas out of their a$$
Anonymous wrote:I like the suggestion of Tulane as target based on stats and some of your student’s criteria. Loyola New Orleans is around the corner and could be a safety.
Clark also an excellent suggestion.
It’s in the south but if Nashville appeals, Belmont University is beautiful traditional campus in an urban city.
What about Drew University in NJ? It’s a 45 minute train ride into NYC.
If open to Midwest, I think Oberlin and Kenyon could be targets.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - thanks for all the great responses
Some of these she’s looked at / been thinking about
- PiTT is on the list
- GW felt not campus-y enough but we weren’t on an official tour so maybe we missed something ? Otherwise loves DC
- Macalester felt like it maybe didn’t have as much STEM emphasis?
Will be a NMSF so I feel like USC and Fordham like that but I don’t know much about Fordham for STEM and I think she is on the fence about NYC for college
I wish Rice was in a different location- she really isn’t interested in TX
Anonymous wrote:It's annoying that people keep recommending schools in the south when OP already said that's a no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?
No they don’t. Posters on these boards pulling ideas out of their a$$
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having trouble figuring out targets / likelies since everything is so competitive these days …things that were once safeties are no more
Also we are not instate for MD or DC so those options are out
What do you think would be targets or likelies for 4.0 UW, 4.6+ Weighted, 1550+ SAT, excellent ECs, will have around 11 or more APs w 5s so far
Looking for
- midsize or smaller school (maybe 8,000 or fewer under grads)
- likes an actual defined campus
- prefers urban or urban adjacent locations
- prefers collaborative vs competitive environment
- they like an intellectual vibe but also want an engaged student population that is involved in a lot of activities
- has a few academic interests - so wants STEM and humanities
- open on geography - except not really into the south -eg, no FL, Tx
-would be full pay and can do it
- not athlete , not URM
- do have legacy at one T25, which they will apply to
It seems like most schools are reaches now and it’s hard to interpret much from our small school’s SCOIR data since often there aren’t a lot of data points or the data is old
Northwestern or WashU/Vanderbilt ED/ED2
Anonymous wrote:Where are you in-state? Helps to know. (You just said not DC or MD so wasn’t sure if that meant VA or if you’re in another part of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Do 4.0/1550 kids really end up at Belmont or Drew because of lack of better options?
I can see choosing these schools for specific programs or scholarships dollars or vicinity to home or any number of reasons but....are there really kids who end up there simply because they're a target school and they don't get in anywhere else?