Anonymous wrote:This has been bothering me for a long time.
Every four years, the world’s attention is drawn to the Olympic Games.
And we all get bombarded with constant adds, reminders, images, coverage etc. for months in advance of the Games.
Then we are again repeatedly assaulted for months afterwards, with athletes in adds who won gold and landed promotional gigs.
How is it in any way fair we fail to provide the same Media coverage to the Special Olympics?
It’s discrimination, really. An ugly form of modern bigotry, which no one wishes to speak about.
It certainly is not equitable.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a medical doctor and learned about the level of cheating in the Paralympics in residency.
The Paralympic movement is supposedly based on the concept of classification. Classification in the Paralympics is key to making sure competitions are fair by grouping athletes based on their type and level of disability. This way, athletes compete against others with similar physical capabilities, focusing on skill and training rather than the degree of disability. But there have been some recent scandals, especially in swimming and tennis, where the classification system has been manipulated or ignored. Some high profile athletes have been suspected of faking or exaggerating their disabilities to get an edge.
The problems have not been addressed and my mentor thinks they are just getting worse as athletes get away with it. It’s hurts the integrity of the Paralympic Games and makes me less than enthusiastic about watching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
Yes it is fool
Anonymous wrote:This has been bothering me for a long time.
Every four years, the world’s attention is drawn to the Olympic Games.
And we all get bombarded with constant adds, reminders, images, coverage etc. for months in advance of the Games.
Then we are again repeatedly assaulted for months afterwards, with athletes in adds who won gold and landed promotional gigs.
How is it in any way fair we fail to provide the same Media coverage to the Special Olympics?
It’s discrimination, really. An ugly form of modern bigotry, which no one wishes to speak about.
It certainly is not equitable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
That has nothing to do with the network’s equitable obligation to provide equal coverage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
That has nothing to do with the network’s equitable obligation to provide equal coverage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
That has nothing to do with the network’s equitable obligation to provide equal coverage.
Who decided they had this obligation?
Anonymous wrote:The Paralympics is comparable to the Olympics. The special Olympics is a great organization, but is not at all similar to the Olympics, in function or intent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s nice that this organization exists and allows people to compete, but it’s not a moral failing if the average Joe doesn’t want to watch.
Who says the average Joe doesn’t want to watch?
That’s once said about women’s softball yet it makes as much money as many men’s sports except the big 2.
If you air it they will come.
Who watches women's softball? Is that even aired on TV? Beyond the Olympics themselves, the only women's sports I see on TV are basketball and volleyball (usually the beach variety).