Anonymous wrote:Sorry OP, this is how most men are. And don't worry, he's doing the typical male thing and putting on a show for the new lady - once he thinks he's got her caught, he'll start disregarding her just like he did your mother.
This is how most men are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry for your loss OP, Dad did the same thing...I rarely see a man stay un-coupled after a multi-decade spouse passes away....
I don't get it. I'm a man in a long marriage with a wife with some ailments, and would not be surprised if she passes away before me. And if it happened, the last thing I would want to do is recouple. It would be the opportunity to do things that were put off for years - travel, go to museums, hike, learn a foreign language, etc. Not saying I would live like Thoreau, but not interested in having to answer to someone else. In fact, that is what I have always admired about women - they don't feel the need to be with a partner 100% of their adult life.
Anonymous wrote:When my mother died it wasn't long before the single ladies either widowed or divorced were knocking on his door. If you're a 55+ single woman, a 68 year old good looking guy with money is a real target. He mentioned that it often happened but I didn't want to know the details. It's been two years and he now does have a SO who thankfully has plenty of money on her own so she is not after his.
Anonymous wrote:When my mother died it wasn't long before the single ladies either widowed or divorced were knocking on his door. If you're a 55+ single woman, a 68 year old good looking guy with money is a real target. He mentioned that it often happened but I didn't want to know the details. It's been two years and he now does have a SO who thankfully has plenty of money on her own so she is not after his.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry for your loss OP, Dad did the same thing...I rarely see a man stay un-coupled after a multi-decade spouse passes away....
I don't get it. I'm a man in a long marriage with a wife with some ailments, and would not be surprised if she passes away before me. And if it happened, the last thing I would want to do is recouple. It would be the opportunity to do things that were put off for years - travel, go to museums, hike, learn a foreign language, etc. Not saying I would live like Thoreau, but not interested in having to answer to someone else. In fact, that is what I have always admired about women - they don't feel the need to be with a partner 100% of their adult life.
Anonymous wrote:sorry for your loss OP, Dad did the same thing...I rarely see a man stay un-coupled after a multi-decade spouse passes away....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.
That they would not be amenable for this discussion?
I have a friend and her MiL passed away 25 years ago. FiL has been in a LT relationship for nearly 20 years. They've bought some property (he has) in both their names and it will go to her when he passes away. My friend's sibling in laws are worked up about this, but my friend and her DH are pretty chill because they know FiL can be a challenge and his partner is really caring for him as his health declines.
Correct.
There is no discussion beyond them saying "No."
Do you think they have never had an expectation of leaving money to their children?
I don't remember where I read, maybe here, a poster indicating that she had set up money separately to go directly to the children if something were to ever happen to her (I'm not a lawyer so IDK the vehicles one uses). She basically said, "Look, I have a great marriage. But I also have heard enough in my parents' generation to know that there are enough times where a spouse dies, usually the wife, and there is a s second marriage where all - or the majority of - the assets go to the second spouse and their children. I work FT, I've contributed a lot of money to our combined wealth, and I want our children to receive 50% of it."
I don't know about never, but in their later years-at least for my dad, yes.
When he was growing up his parents (specifically his dad) were pretty miserly. They did pay for my Dad's college, but were very cheap with lots of other things. When my grandparents died, they left a lot of money to their kids (my dad and his siblings.)
But my dad seems bitter that his dad didn't spend money on him and his siblings when they were still alive (like never gave them money for a down payment on a house.)
His feelings now are that if his parents didn't do that for him, there's no way he's going to do anything like that for his own kids---but also he doesn't want to leave us any money either.
My mom died about a year ago and he has flat out said that he wants to get remarried so that the new wife can inherit his money so his kids won't get anything.
It's bizarre--it's not like we are spoiled ungrateful (adult) kids or anything.
That's sad that he is not motivated to counter his parents' conduct. I'm sorry that this is your experience.
I don't think that caring for one's parents is necessarily transactional, yet this type of labor is completely uncompensated in our economy and can come up at great emotional, financial, and physical toll for the caregivers. Does he just assume that you all will do this w/o a second thought?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.
That they would not be amenable for this discussion?
I have a friend and her MiL passed away 25 years ago. FiL has been in a LT relationship for nearly 20 years. They've bought some property (he has) in both their names and it will go to her when he passes away. My friend's sibling in laws are worked up about this, but my friend and her DH are pretty chill because they know FiL can be a challenge and his partner is really caring for him as his health declines.
Correct.
There is no discussion beyond them saying "No."
Do you think they have never had an expectation of leaving money to their children?
I don't remember where I read, maybe here, a poster indicating that she had set up money separately to go directly to the children if something were to ever happen to her (I'm not a lawyer so IDK the vehicles one uses). She basically said, "Look, I have a great marriage. But I also have heard enough in my parents' generation to know that there are enough times where a spouse dies, usually the wife, and there is a s second marriage where all - or the majority of - the assets go to the second spouse and their children. I work FT, I've contributed a lot of money to our combined wealth, and I want our children to receive 50% of it."
I don't know about never, but in their later years-at least for my dad, yes.
When he was growing up his parents (specifically his dad) were pretty miserly. They did pay for my Dad's college, but were very cheap with lots of other things. When my grandparents died, they left a lot of money to their kids (my dad and his siblings.)
But my dad seems bitter that his dad didn't spend money on him and his siblings when they were still alive (like never gave them money for a down payment on a house.)
His feelings now are that if his parents didn't do that for him, there's no way he's going to do anything like that for his own kids---but also he doesn't want to leave us any money either.
My mom died about a year ago and he has flat out said that he wants to get remarried so that the new wife can inherit his money so his kids won't get anything.
It's bizarre--it's not like we are spoiled ungrateful (adult) kids or anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.
That they would not be amenable for this discussion?
I have a friend and her MiL passed away 25 years ago. FiL has been in a LT relationship for nearly 20 years. They've bought some property (he has) in both their names and it will go to her when he passes away. My friend's sibling in laws are worked up about this, but my friend and her DH are pretty chill because they know FiL can be a challenge and his partner is really caring for him as his health declines.
Correct.
There is no discussion beyond them saying "No."
Do you think they have never had an expectation of leaving money to their children?
I don't remember where I read, maybe here, a poster indicating that she had set up money separately to go directly to the children if something were to ever happen to her (I'm not a lawyer so IDK the vehicles one uses). She basically said, "Look, I have a great marriage. But I also have heard enough in my parents' generation to know that there are enough times where a spouse dies, usually the wife, and there is a s second marriage where all - or the majority of - the assets go to the second spouse and their children. I work FT, I've contributed a lot of money to our combined wealth, and I want our children to receive 50% of it."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.
That they would not be amenable for this discussion?
I have a friend and her MiL passed away 25 years ago. FiL has been in a LT relationship for nearly 20 years. They've bought some property (he has) in both their names and it will go to her when he passes away. My friend's sibling in laws are worked up about this, but my friend and her DH are pretty chill because they know FiL can be a challenge and his partner is really caring for him as his health declines.
Correct.
There is no discussion beyond them saying "No."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.
That they would not be amenable for this discussion?
I have a friend and her MiL passed away 25 years ago. FiL has been in a LT relationship for nearly 20 years. They've bought some property (he has) in both their names and it will go to her when he passes away. My friend's sibling in laws are worked up about this, but my friend and her DH are pretty chill because they know FiL can be a challenge and his partner is really caring for him as his health declines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Make sure his money goes to you, now or later, and not to that woman.
The rest is just fluff, you’ll get over it! But yes I get the feeling and I am sorry. But focus on the key things.
How does one do that?
DP here
She can only do that if the Dad agrees. And, given my experience with my FIL and my own father, he probably won't agree to that.