Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Before I had kids, I was convinced it was nurture, not nature.
Then I had kids. Great kids. But, it is 80% nature or higher. We control much less than what we think or want.
You think boy and girl infants act differently?
DP
I think PP treated them differently then chalked their incentivized behavioral differences up to nature, not her (and society's) differential treatment. She basically pressed the "I don't want to think beyond the surface" button in her own brain.
Anonymous wrote:I'd love to scan my brain because I really think I think and act like a man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Before I had kids, I was convinced it was nurture, not nature.
Then I had kids. Great kids. But, it is 80% nature or higher. We control much less than what we think or want.
You think boy and girl infants act differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
First intelligent comment on this board. Brains are known to have neuroplasticity which means they change due to their environmental conditions. How do you separate our sexist environment to understand true biological differences. We can't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All this BS just to divide the genders. Nothing like causing women to hate men and men to hate women. What a waste of money.
The only reason women are less intelligent is the makeup we wear is causing us to be that way. The poison they add to the products causes your brain to pause. All done to make us look crazy. We aren't . We're experiments for them to watch.
Women don’t need to be convinced to hate men. That’s as old as our species.
But a decade from now when animatronic sex/companion robots start to become mainstream among Gen Z, young men WILL need to be convinced why real, human women are worth the trouble.
Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sexist drivel.
You're an idiot.
Men and women's brains are absolutely different. They've known about this for years. For example, DNA methylation patterns for tissues in the brain are different in men vs women.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-019-0416-2
https://epigenie.com/sex-on-the-brain-dna-methylation-defines-gender/
We need to stop treating men and women the same, because they're not. It is scientific fact.
Well, hang on. Brains have differences, just like bodies do, but why does that lead you think they shouldn't be treated the same? Quite an extreme leap you took there. What other differences among us all do you thing should cause people to be treated differently?
NP
Depends on what you mean by “treated differently.” A kid with a learning disability or anxiety - should they get testing accommodations? Because that would be treating them differently.
Is that what this study says about the differences between male and female brains? That all of one gender has a disability?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What sexist drivel.
You're an idiot.
Men and women's brains are absolutely different. They've known about this for years. For example, DNA methylation patterns for tissues in the brain are different in men vs women.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-019-0416-2
https://epigenie.com/sex-on-the-brain-dna-methylation-defines-gender/
We need to stop treating men and women the same, because they're not. It is scientific fact.
Well, hang on. Brains have differences, just like bodies do, but why does that lead you think they shouldn't be treated the same? Quite an extreme leap you took there. What other differences among us all do you thing should cause people to be treated differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who didn’t think there were differences between male and female brains?
Don’t we know that women have a far better sense of smell and color? That’s all brain related.
It’s interesting for sure but not earth shattering.
Rhymes with smurfs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Before I had kids, I was convinced it was nurture, not nature.
Then I had kids. Great kids. But, it is 80% nature or higher. We control much less than what we think or want.
You think boy and girl infants act differently?
DP
Absolutely.
Anonymous wrote:Who didn’t think there were differences between male and female brains?
Don’t we know that women have a far better sense of smell and color? That’s all brain related.
It’s interesting for sure but not earth shattering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Before I had kids, I was convinced it was nurture, not nature.
Then I had kids. Great kids. But, it is 80% nature or higher. We control much less than what we think or want.
Anonymous wrote:I'd love to scan my brain because I really think I think and act like a man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They were tests run on adults, which means they were looking at brains that had decades to develop neural pathways while living in a highly gendered society.
Before I had kids, I was convinced it was nurture, not nature.
Then I had kids. Great kids. But, it is 80% nature or higher. We control much less than what we think or want.
You think boy and girl infants act differently?